‘Utter Drivel’- Long Known for Her Strong Views on Gender Biasness, Martina Navratilova Slams Renowned American Journalist for Her Controversial Take On Inclusivity

In a recent Twitter exchange, renowned tennis champion Martina Navratilova engaged in a heated discussion with American journalist Emma Vigeland over the issue of TERFism. The exchange ignited a fiery debate on social media, drawing attention to the contrasting perspectives on gender identity and feminism.

Navratilova’s rebuttal highlighted the complexity and sensitivity surrounding these topics.

The Twitter clash between Navratilova and Vigeland on TERFism

Emma Vigeland, a well-known American journalist, shared her thoughts on TERFism in a tweet that provoked a reaction from Martina Navratilova. Vigeland’s tweet claimed that TERFism reinforces traditional gender roles and restricts women by defining womanhood based on their sexual or reproductive organs.

Vigeland’s tweet read, “TERFism actually upholds patriarchy by gatekeeping femininity, insisting that the boundaries of womanhood are drawn by sexual and/or reproductive organs. By reinforcing existing gender binaries, TERFs lock women into the male gaze: whether for baby-making or mere sexualization.”

Navratilova promptly countered Vigeland’s statement, calling it “utter drivel” and challenging the notion that being a woman is solely tied to femininity. She retorted, “Being a woman doesn’t mean being feminine… it can be that but absolutely doesn’t mean it needs to be that. Male gaze… I mean whaaaat?!?”

Emma Vigeland replied to Navratilova’s comment with the following statement, “Serena Williams is the greatest of all time”

This isn’t the first time Navratilova has been actively involved in a Twitter discussion. As the Twitter clash intensified, Navratilova further responded to other participants on the same thread, calling them out.

Navratilova’s response to another participant’s alleged “man-splaining”

As the debate continued, a participant in the Twitter thread tried to explain Vigeland’s viewpoint, suggesting that she was discussing how femininity is perceived by men, rather than being an inherent quality of women. The person stated, “Martina, Emma was talking about femininity not as a concept coming from women but as the idea men have about women. TERFs are trying to restrict what women can or can’t do. My father was one of those. I think you misunderstood Emma’s post.”

ALSO READ: Days After Chris Evert’s Brutal Dig at $650,000,000,000 Possible Tennis Move, Martina Navratilova Stands by Her Long-Time Friend to Condemn Authorities

Navratilova, however, dismissed the explanation as “mansplaining” and sarcastically thanked the individual. This response highlighted the heightened emotions and difficulties in finding common ground.

The clash between Martina Navratilova and Emma Vigeland regarding TERFism shed light on the deep divisions and contrasting opinions within discussions about gender identity and feminism.

WATCH THIS STORY: Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal, Serena Williams And Others In The Greatest Career Comebacks In Tennis