Emma Navarro’s saga of unfortunate events is not coming to an end. After missing out on the opportunity in Flushing Meadows in the semi-finals against Aryna Sabalenka (6-3, 7-6(2)), she landed in China with new hope. However, that dream shattered within a day as she lost to home favorite Zheng Shuai (4-6, 2-6). Not losing a moment to nurse her broken heart, Navarro hoped on to her next quest—until it landed her in a huge controversy.
The incident unfolded when Navarro announced her participation in the inaugural WTA 125 tournament in Hong Kong after her China Open loss. “Hey, guys. Emma Navarro here. Just wanted you to know I am gonna be playing at the 125 here in Hong Kong next week. Really excited to be here and hopefully gonna see this city a little bit and play some great tennis so looking forward to see you guys there,” she wrote on Instagram Stories.
However, critics appeared miffed with the World No. 8’s decision to play in a low-tier tournament. While many opined Navarro’s participation took away the chances of many lower-ranked players, with comments stating “Top 10 player playing WTA 125…. what a shameless vulture” and “Emma Navarro is so greedy it’s not even funny”, among others, Olympic gold medalist and 21 singles title winner Pam Shriver had a completely different opinion…
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
On September 19, tennis podcaster Myles Davis appeared frustrated. He took to X to ask: “Can someone explain to me how Emma Navarro, currently the 8th best player on the women’s tennis tour, is a top seed at a Challenger level (below top tier) tournament in Hong Kong next week?”
Polls of the day
Poll 1 of 6
Do you support Emma Navarro's sudden decision despite the fan backlash?
Absolutely
Not at all
Undecided
Need more information
Who do you think will dominate the China Open clash?
Aryna Sabalenka
Ashlyn Krueger
It will be a close match
Whats your Perspective on:
Emma Navarro's break: A smart move for mental health or a sign of weakness in today's athletes?
Have an interesting take?
Do you believe Jannik Sinner is innocent in the doping controversy?
Absolutely
Not sure
No way
Do you think Alexis Ohanian's approach to balancing parental love and business is commendable?
Absolutely
It's reasonable
Not really
He should be more lenient
Do you believe Jannik Sinner is innocent in the doping controversy?
Absolutely
No way
Not sure
Need more evidence
In response, Shriver explained why Navarro’s decision was wise. “We thought about playing this challenger too if a first round loss in Beijing. These 1000s over two weeks can mean a long wait until next tournament. Playing the 125 is smart,” tweeted the former WTA star. Davis agreed with Shriver’s reasoning and showed that Navarro had no other option but to play the tournament, writing, “ I hadn’t really sat with the fact that Beijing was also more than just a 1 week 1000 and what the options are like for players who lose earlier on. And now i see it’s kind of baked into the rules to allow that flexibility for players,” he added.
The podcaster also added a rulebook screenshot that mentioned the exceptions given to players for playing in a Women’s ITF World Tennis Tournament, a WTA 125 Tournament or a WTA 1000 Mandatory Tournament.
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
We thought about playing this challenger too if a first round loss in Beijing. These 1000s over two weeks can mean a long wait until next tournament. Playing the 125 is smart.
— Pam Shriver (@PHShriver) September 29, 2024
What’s your perspective on:
Emma Navarro's break: A smart move for mental health or a sign of weakness in today's athletes?
Have an interesting take?
Hong Kong China Tennis Federation calls Emma Navarro “an inspiration”
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
After much criticism, Pam Shriver’s statement helps to clarify Emma Navarro’s decision. Now that she will play in Victoria Park, her fans in Hong Kong are eagerly waiting to see her magic on the court.
Debate
Emma Navarro's break: A smart move for mental health or a sign of weakness in today's athletes?