Recently, a contentious battle on the football field has reignited discussions about gender equality in high school sports. Valley Christian Academy, based in Santa Maria, California, stirred up controversy by forfeiting games against opposing teams. They refrained from playing with groups that included female players. This recurring decision soon sparked debates about Title IX regulations, debating the treatment of female athletes in contact sports.
The Valley Christian Academy made headlines after declaring the sudden note on the September 30th game against Coast Union. As the team boasted two female players, this was not the first time they had been rejected. The incident marked the second consecutive year the school had chosen to forfeit a game against Coast Union. It also depicted the fourth consecutive year of them doing the same.
Disputes arise with debated football rules
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
The school’s firm decision did not go unnoticed, with critics questioning the Valley’s stance on gender inclusivity in sports. Joel Mikkelson, the superintendent of Valley Christian Academy, defended their actions. Asserting that Title IX regulations do not apply to contact sports, Joel stated, “Title IX is very clear that contact sports are exempt from Title IX.” However, this interpretation of the law has already met with skepticism from many quarters.
Read More: Video: Chaos erupts at Raiders match gallery as women engage in UFC-style fight for a seat
In 2021, Valley Christian Academy had to settle a Title IX lawsuit related to a similar incident involving a female player. With the case against a student from Cuyama Valley High School, their settlement amounted to $20,000. Although the school was allowed to deny any wrongdoing, this legal dispute, while settled, left a visible trail. Evidently, the incident left lingering questions among many about Valley Christian’s approach to gender equality in sports.
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
A wave of complexities unfold
Valley Christian Academy’s decision to avoid games against teams with female opponents in contact sports immediately generated strong reactions. On one side, it was seen as an attempt to prioritize safety. Many noted it as a way to avoid putting male athletes in potentially uncomfortable situations. On the other hand, it was severely viewed as discrimination against female athletes, as well as a violation of Title IX.
Head coach Andrew Crosby of Coast Union expressed his disappointment, emphasizing his concerns for the female players on his team. He added that his students, Emily Reed and Andrea Aguilar, should not be singled out based on gender, stating, “It’s not fair.” The coach’s words echoed the sentiment of many who support including female athletes in contact sports. Section 106.41(b) of Title IX permits separate teams based on competitive skill or in contact sports.
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
However, it also mandates that if a recipient sponsors a sport for one sex but not the other, excluded sex members must be allowed to try out. But the rules are applicable unless it is a contact sport, according to the guidelines section. As Valley Christian Academy grapples with the fallout from its decisions, the debate over gender equality in high school sports rages. The school’s interpretation of Title IX and its impact on female athletes remain contentious, raising questions about fairness. What is your opinion on this much-argued case? Let us know in the comments!
Watch This Story: Dad’s last-minute entry at Jefferson High football game brightens daughter’s homecoming moment
Challenge Your Sports Knowledge!
Solve the puzzle and prove your knowledge of iconic players, terms, and moments.