Home/Track & Field

According to the World Athletics definition—a long jump is when a participant sprints down a runway and jumps as far as they can from a wooden take-off board into a sandpit in track and field. Then, the distance is measured from the board’s edge to the nearest sand depression. In addition, the format rules, which first mentioned the “take-off board,” reverses in the trial announced by World Athletics CEO Jon Ridgeon, who proposed replacing the take-off board with a “take-off zone.

This would measure the distance between the athlete’s point of takeoff and their landing in the pit, thus eliminating fouls. Now, the community is divided, while a reigning European champion recently weighed in on the bizarre proposal, including “cheating” in its possible outcome.

Long Jump Pro calls out the cons

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

Following Jon Ridgeon’s disclosure of the trial on the Anything But Footy podcast, a flurry of responses ensued, with 2023 European Indoor Champion Jazmin Sawyers heading to Instagram to voice her disapproval of the proposed alteration, which was later reposted on X by @_OwenM_. The multi-sport medalist shared a few videos outlining two advantages and eight disadvantages of the trial, one of which she brashly called “cheating.”

Sawyers first noted the possible advantages in her thorough analysis, including the chance to watch greater leaps which meant possible new records and the ability to count every jump. However, the 29-year-old British athlete brought up important considerations, especially about grassroots events where it may be difficult to track take-off spots accurately.

She brought up the possibility of cheating and other negative aspects, including time limits, eliminating a necessary skill component, less drama, and the audience’s inability to estimate the height of the jump. Some veteran Olympians also joined in the disapproval of the World Athletics statement.

American legend stands against the new rule

Sawyers’ objection is not unique as she was joined by Carl Lewis, the American long jump icon with four straight Olympic gold medals from 1984 to 1996, who shared his incredulity on X. Lewis highlighted the long jump’s difficulty and claimed that the planned change would remove the most difficult skill from the competition. He also mockingly wrote, “you’re supposed to wait until April 1st for April Fools jokes.”

 

READ MORE “100% No”: Track and Field Enthusiasts Showcase Mixed Reactions As World Athletics Comes Up With Sudden Change

The internet is still split on the issue, with sportsmen and legends expressing disapproval. It is conceivable that viewpoints will become clearer as the trial continues. Still, should the traditional long jump, a mainstay since the 1896 Olympics, see such a radical transformation? What do you think about this suggested change in one of the longest-existing sports?

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

Watch this story Days After Being Hammered at the Diamond League Finals, Noah Lyles Departs on a Free Time Spree with Girlfriend

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad