What goes around, comes back around. Probably that’s what Chloe San Jose, Filipino gymnast and Olympic gold medalist Carlos Yulo’s girlfriend, is thinking right now. The 22-year-old successful model has been severely criticized for getting entangled in the Yulo family drama that has taken over the world in recent weeks. However, it looks like Carlos’ bae finally has something to smile about, albeit at someone else’s cost.
The gymnast made history earlier this year at the Paris Olympics, where he won the first-ever men’s gymnastics Olympic gold medal for the Philippines. Subsequently, Carlos got entangled in a public dispute with his mother Angelica Yulo over the Olympian’s financial situation, and San Jose became a part of the messy affair as well. With all the harsh words she had to endure, it now looks like Jose has something to clap back at one of her critics.
Carlos Yulo’s beau takes a jab at Filipino actress
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
Tara Ph posted on Facebook on November 14 the model’s response to the news of Ai-Ai delas Alas’ conjugal troubles. The Tanging Ina actress recently confessed that she and her husband Gerald Sibayan have been living separately since October this year because of an estranged relationship. However, the news has allowed Chloe San to retort back to Alas, who had previously urged the former to be respectful of Yulo’s mother and other family members.
“Not to make fun of your situation, but what you do to others will come right back at you 10x,” wrote Carlos’ celebrity girlfriend in her social media update. She went on to remind us that karma works in mysterious ways, stating, “it’s just the universe’s law“. When the Yulo family debacle erupted and spilled over to public knowledge, Delas opined that maintaining a good relationship with future in-laws is important. Naturally, the unsolicited remark didn’t sit well with Chloe and her Olympic gold medalist boyfriend, and the Filipino’s recent misfortune has only given them a chance to jeer back.
What’s your perspective on:
Is Chloe San Jose justified in her response, or should she have taken the high road?
Have an interesting take?
Delas’ comments came as a response to the alleged disrespectful comments San Jose made toward Angelica, as per screenshots that came to light on September 5. The matter has spiraled downward since, and multiple efforts to reach an amicable solution have been unfruitful.
A bumpy ride for the Yulo family
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
The Olympic history-maker claimed that his mother mishandled his financial statements and took away significant portions of his earnings. However, Angelica responded saying she was only trying to protect her son. Amidst the fiasco, San Jose also received a lot of backlash for her comments on the situation. The fans as well have labeled Chloe as “selfish” and accused her of stealing attention from Carlos Yulo. However, his girlfriend has stated that the criticism doesn’t get under her skin anymore, and she has learned to look elsewhere to keep her sanity. “We pray together. Every night and every morning when we wake up. We are immediately grateful that the Lord woke us up today… I just look at him. It’s as if the noise is filtered once I look at him straight in the eyes,” San Jose said recently.
But the drama has ensued. Yulo also revealed that his mother judges San Jose on how she “acts and dresses” making things murkier. However, he needs to put the entire drama in his rearview mirror, pronto. Thanks to Carlos’ emphatic Parisian campaign, the Philippines is bumping up its efforts to have more gymnasts represent the country at the 2028 Los Angeles Olympics. There, Carlos could have his younger brother Eldrew as his national teammate, and the excitement is understandably high.
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
What are your thoughts on the whole issue? How would you think Carlos Yulo can restore balance in his turbulent life? Suggest in a comment below!
Have something to say?
Let the world know your perspective.
Debate
Is Chloe San Jose justified in her response, or should she have taken the high road?