

When Matthew Tkachuk crunched Jake Guentzel into the boards in Game 3, the Florida Panthers’ star didn’t just spark a penalty—he ignited a firestorm of debate that’s tearing through NHL fandom. The Battle of Florida is serving up more than just goals; it’s dishing out drama, hard hits, and a side of controversy. The NHL’s Department of Player Safety ruled that Tkachuk won’t face a hearing or further discipline for the hit, and the decision’s got fans picking sides faster than a puck drop.
Social media lit up, too. A tweet from Spittin’ Chiclets read, “No hearing for Tkachuk. Thoughts?” One fan shrugged it off, saying, “lol, why would there be a hearing, no injury or injury potential.” Others, though, saw inconsistency, pointing to Hagel’s suspension as a measuring stick. Barkov missed the end of Game 2’s third period but was back for Game 3, while Guentzel kept skating.
Tkachuk’s hit in the third period of Florida’s 5-1 loss on Saturday earned him a five-minute major for interference. According to ESPN sources, the league deemed that penalty sufficient, noting Guentzel had recently touched the puck and Tkachuk avoided contact with his head. Contrast that with Tampa Bay’s Brandon Hagel’s hit on Florida captain Aleksander Barkov in Game 2, which landed Hagel a one-game suspension. Hagel also got a five-minute major, but the puck was long gone when he connected with Barkov, and the NHL saw more force in that play.
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
The decisions fueled a war of words between the coaches. After Barkov’s hit, Panthers coach Paul Maurice quipped, “The only players we hit are the ones with pucks.” Following Tkachuk’s hit, Lightning coach Jon Cooper cheekily echoed the exact same line. It’s the kind of spicy back-and-forth that makes this rivalry pop. Social media lit up, too. A tweet from Spittin’ Chiclets read, “No hearing for Tkachuk. Thoughts?” One fan shrugged it off, saying, “lol, why would there be a hearing, no injury or injury potential.” Others, though, saw inconsistency, pointing to Hagel’s suspension as a measuring stick. Barkov missed the end of Game 2’s third period but was back for Game 3, while Guentzel kept skating.
No hearing for Tkachuk. Thoughts? pic.twitter.com/jzwcprQUpI
— Spittin' Chiclets (@spittinchiclets) April 27, 2025
On the ice, Matthew Tkachuk’s leading the Panthers with three goals and an assist through three games, while Guentzel’s got two goals and two assists for Tampa. This series, as tight and fiery as it is, with either Florida or Tampa representing the East in the Stanley Cup Final for the past five years. As Game 4 looms Monday at Amerant Bank Arena, the hits, the jabs, and the debates are only heating up. One thing’s clear: this rivalry’s got no chill.
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
NHL Fans left divided over Matthew Tkachuk’s decision
Matthew Tkachuk’s recent on-ice incident has sparked heated debate among NHL fans, with opinions split over whether his actions warranted disciplinary action. The controversy stems from a hit delivered by Tkachuk, which some argue was clean and within the rules, while others view it as reckless and deserving of scrutiny. The NHL Department of Player Safety’s handling of the situation has further fueled the divide, with fans expressing frustration over perceived inconsistencies in enforcement.
What’s your perspective on:
Did the NHL get it right with Tkachuk's no-hearing decision, or is it a double standard?
Have an interesting take?
Some fans staunchly defend Matthew Tkachuk, arguing the hit was legal and part of the game’s physicality. “Since when should clean hits require a hearing?” one fan posted on X, emphasizing that Tkachuk’s play was textbook and shouldn’t have been questioned. Another echoed, “Wild anyone thought it should’ve required a hearing let alone a minor penalty. Clean hit. Keep your head up.” These supporters point to the context of the play, noting that Tkachuk made contact with the puck, distinguishing it from more dangerous hits. “Night and day diff hits. Context completely diff. No puck touch + puck touch,” a fan explained, highlighting the importance of situational factors.
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
Conversely, others criticized Tkachuk, labeling the hit as irresponsible and characteristic of his aggressive style. “Another bush league move by a Tkachuk that goes undisciplined,” one fan remarked, suggesting a pattern of questionable plays escaping punishment. The sentiment reflects broader dissatisfaction with the NHL’s Department of Player Safety, which many fans feel lacks consistency. “Department of Player Safety is a total joke with absolutely no consistency on enforcement,” a frustrated fan stated, pointing to past incidents where similar hits received vastly different rulings.
The polarized reactions underscore a deeper issue within the NHL: the challenge of balancing player safety with the sport’s physical nature. While some fans believe Matthew Tkachuk’s hit was fair and opponents should be more aware, others argue that such plays risk unnecessary injury and require stricter oversight. As the debate rages on, the NHL’s inconsistent disciplinary approach continues to draw scrutiny, leaving fans divided and the league’s safety protocols under question.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Did the NHL get it right with Tkachuk's no-hearing decision, or is it a double standard?