Team USA’s Jordan Chiles was on a hunt for her first career individual medal. In the floors exercise, she was originally awarded 13.666 which placed her fifth after Brazil’s Rebeca Andrade, teammate Simone Biles, and two Romanians—Ana Bărbosu and Sabrina Voinea (scores tied). Team America coach Cecile Landiappealed to the panel to re-evaluate her difficulty score, elevating her routine score and position to an adjusted 13.766 and bronze medal on the podium, respectively. Barbosu was unconsolable while Chiles was ecstatic about the change of fate and how! Five days later, fate reversed. Again.

“The IOC will reallocate the bronze medal to Ana Bǎrbosu (Romania),” the IOC statement on Sunday read. “We are in touch with the (National Olympic Committee) of Romania to discuss the reallocation ceremony and with USOPC regarding the return of the bronze medal.”

On Saturday, in response to a petition submitted by Team Romania, the Court of Arbitration for Sport had maintained that Chiles’ request for an inquiry on the event day was submitted a mere 4-second delay in not meeting the usual 1-minute deadline per Article 8.5 of the FIG Technical Regulations.

The ruling has now handed the bronze win to the Romanian, forcing Chiles to now isolate herself away from all social media platforms on account of mental health. Now, Simone Biles‘ gymnastics club, World Champions Centre has unveiled its own take on this controversy. The statement starts with a “Let’s talk.”

“1/7 In a sport that has so many subjective elements that can drastically vary a score it’s important to remember and generally respect the adjudication the day of the event. Many points can be raised as to what could have or should have been done.
“2/7 For instance: Simone was most likely underscored for her routine. An inquiry could have pushed her over Andrade, but no one is really talking about that.

“3/7 Furthermore, all of the Gymternet and judges can watch routines after a competition & have opinions on connections, deductions, neutral infractions, etc.
“4/7 Everyone who wants to rewrite the final adjudication for their personal athlete should be willing to have the entire competition re-adjudicated for all athletes to the strictest of means to ensure the most complete and fair adjudication has occurred.

“5/7 Furthermore, this situation is not a fault of the athletes. Judges judge, governing bodies make rules, coaches intercede & advocate for their athletes. Stop pushing narratives of athletes stealing medals & glory from others, it’s not their fault, nor their responsibility.
“6/7 We should all be for fairness of competition: equal adjudication, equal enforcement of all infractions, consistent expectations for subjective elements. All of which is difficult on its own let alone when there are multiple judging panels with 9 judges on each.

“7/7 All in, do remember that these are amazing athletes from every country that have persevered their entire lives to reach the Pinnacle of their sport, to put it all on the line. As the sport continues to mature hopefully the community around the sport does as well.”

A disclaimer, however, followed the 7-part X post, or rather, an extension of the point made on how Team USA could have submitted a query on Simone Biles being underscored, if they had wanted to. In fact, the note outrightly clarified that they weren’t trying to stir up a controversy. “This more of raising a mirror to the circumstances surrounding what happened at Bronze. Opening this Pandora’s box of adjudicating in hindsight is a house of cards.” 

Although CAS decided to overturn the bronze win, there was more than just this one appeal made by Team Romania. Apparently, those were all rejected. This included the other Romanian athlete who initially tied with Barbosu (13.700) but later lost her podium contention via a tiebreaker.

Ruling against Jordan Chiles’s bronze was not the only appeal made by the Romanian Olympic Committee

The President of the Romanian Olympic Committee, Mihai Covaliu, in their appeal, had also requested a review to better the floor execution score of Sabrina Maneca-Voinea. What happened on the event day was the judging panel putting a 0.1-score penalty on her for not being in bounds. However, the replay of her routine showed that her heel had narrowly escaped from being called out of bounds. However, the CAS ruled against it.

Regardless, the back and forth with respect to finalizing the results had inadvertently toyed with the mental health of athletes on both sides of the team. On the event day, before the decision was overturned, the young 18-year-old Romanian was seen elated carrying her national flag only to lead her to a mouth-gaping experience (quite literally) when Chiles was given her podium position. She left the Bercey Stadium with tears rolling down like a river.

With Chiles now deciding to go away from all social media platforms, it remains to be seen how she perseveres through tough times ahead. Not to forget, the racial attacks along with being tagged as a “cheater” post the event day will now weigh heavier with her medal taken away. As for Chiles’s latest update, she announced on the Today Show on Thursday that she would be making her collegiate return for the 2025 NCAA season to the UCLA Bruins gymnastics team. Would the 23-year-old follow through with her plans? Only time will tell.