Home/UFC

via Imago

via Imago

Conor McGregor’s recent announcement has set the fighting community abuzz. Confirming a forthcoming clash against Michael Chandler later this year, Conor McGregor once again took center stage, commanding all the attention. With the news of a confirmed fight in December this year, McGregor prepares for another high-stakes showdown. Interestingly, the Irishman has gone so far as to call out Justin Gaethje and Nate Diaz for additional bouts. However, beyond the excitement and anticipation that the declaration brings, there’s a discerning voice that has entered the conversation.

Daniel Cormier, a seasoned UFC veteran renowned for his insight, shed light on a pivotal aspect often overshadowed in the fight game–the realm of testing protocols. As the countdown to the McGregor-Chandler face-off ticks on, the former UFC Heavyweight Champ’s observations opened a window of discussion. He delved into the potential complexities that can arise when handling extraordinary circumstances; especially in the case of fighters of McGregor’s stature.

Inside speculations on new testing methods for Conor McGregor

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

Daniel Cormier’s incisive perspective delved into the uncharted territory of potential testing adjustments. These speculations center around Conor McGregor’s imminent return to the octagon. With ‘The Notorious’ poised to re-enter the realm of combat, Cormier’s contemplation centers around the notion of a tailored testing regimen.

He said, “Even though the rules have stated that it has to be six months before he goes into an actual competition, his manager Audie Attar said we will do everything the right way”. Given McGregor’s hiatus and subsequent comeback, Cormier raised the question of whether the strict testing protocols set forth by the US Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) might adapt to accommodate his unique situation.

Cormier’s line of inquiry revolved around the possibility of an accelerated testing timeline. He stated, “I don’t know if maybe they have like a accelerated program for Conor McGregor, and a guy in his situation. A program where they maybe test McGregor more, before the fight with Chandler.

Read More: Michael Chandler Grabs Conor McGregor’s Opportunity With Both Hands After Irish Star Makes Startling Confession of UFC Return at Anthony Joshua Fight

By proposing this scenario, Cormier cast a spotlight on the dynamics that emerge when fighters like McGregor navigate their readiness. Cormier’s analysis reflects the broader considerations at play. He highlighted the potential for adjustments that would cater to McGregor’s circumstances. This speculation invites observers to ponder over the extent to which the testing landscape might adapt to cater to fighters returning from extended periods of inactivity.

Unpacking the implications: How does this affect the future

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

Daniel Cormier’s thought-provoking analysis extended beyond speculation, delving into the potential implications of adopting exceptional testing measures for fighters of McGregor’s caliber. The idea of tailoring tests to individual circumstances might seem reasonable on the surface. However, Cormier’s scrutiny brings to light a web of concerns. Regarding this, DC stated, “You make that exception. Then how do you implement this rule for the rest of the people? We’ve seen exceptions before. And generally, they are for the most high-profile and best fighters in the world, which Conor McGregor does fit into that category”.

via Getty

DC revisited his concerns and said, “My question is though, how do you implement and make the USADA program be what it’s supposed to be, when there are rooms for exceptions?”. Cormier’s reservations underline a critical point; the challenge of maintaining consistency and fairness within the realm of protocol. By making exceptions for fighters like McGregor, the very foundation of the USADA’s testing program could face future problems.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

Cormier’s astute observations act as a reminder; decisions involving high-profile athletes, like ‘The Notorious’, reverberate far beyond the confines of a single fight. The question that emerges is how the sport can navigate these circumstances without compromising its integrity. They must also ensure that the essence of fair competition remains intact. Do you agree with DC’s comments? Let us know in the comments below.

Watch This Story: Conor McGregor Gives a Fired-Up Speech During TUF 31