“It Only Makes Sense for Him to…”: Jake Paul Comes Clean on How He Felt When Drake Put $250,000 Wager on Nate Diaz to Beat the 26-Year-Old

In the relentless world of combat sports, loyalties can often take surprising turns. Every gambit played inside the ring sends ripples across the outside world, influencing fan loyalties and even impacting high-stake wagers. Recently, an example in this narrative emerged when global music sensation Drake revealed details of his weighty $250,000 wager on Nate Diaz in his fight against the dynamic internet personality-turned-boxer Jake Paul. This betting revelation was discussed candidly in a recent episode of Logan Paul‘s podcast featuring Jake Paul, shedding light on the complexities of alliances within the fight game.

In a world as unpredictable as boxing, reactions can often be the difference between making or breaking a career. The Paul brothers, known for their outspoken demeanor, seldom shy away from expressing their thoughts, whether about their opponents or about factors influencing their fights. Jake Paul’s response to Drake’s bet was as upfront as expected, in harmony with his unapologetic style. He offered his perspective on Drake’s bet on Diaz and cleared up his views on the same.

Drake Bets on Diaz – A Display of Loyalties

Speaking candidly on the podcast, Jake Paul expressed his lack of resentment over Drake’s hefty bet against him. When co-host Mike Majlak asked Jake if he felt slighted by Drake’s choice, he responded with a level of nonchalance and understanding: “No, not at all. I actually liked it because I wanted more people to get rowdy on Nate’s side of things and for Nate to have a lot of support going into the fight”. Jake also made it clear that he recognized Drake’s longstanding support for Nate Diaz and his elder brother, Nick.

Despite being on the other side of the ring, he remained empathetic to Drake’s decision. He said, “And it’s all like, who cares? You know what I’m saying? It’s like Drake’s gonna do whatever he wants. Like he’s a, he’s a man, and he’s been a Nate Diaz fan and likes the Diaz brothers since he first started watching fighting”. This statement sheds light on the intricate web of loyalties in the boxing arena. Personal preferences and past alliances often shape the course of bets and support.

A Throwback to a Lost Bet

Jake Paul also took a quick jab, referencing the time Drake backed him in a fight against Tommy Fury. He said, “And he bet on me against Tommy and then lost”. This refers to the said fight where Jake did not emerge victorious, and Drake faced a monetary loss. This instance underlines the unpredictable nature of betting in combat sports, its quick turnovers, and unforeseen results. Jake Paul’s nonchalant dismissal of what could be perceived as a slight by many highlights his understanding of Drake’s loyalty towards the Diaz brothers.

Read More: “Moving Backwards Like I Was Watching a Fight in Rewind”: After Jake Paul’s Cheeky Advice, Conor McGregor Lashes Out at the 26-Year-Old’s Fight Against Nate Diaz

‘The Problem Child’ also exudes the sporting spirit often hidden beneath the tough veneer of combat sports. As unpredictable as the ring can be, the perceptions, alliances, and rivalries outside it often match its uncertainty. These interactions further enrich the spectator experience as well. As the boxing world continues to bring forth such intriguing incidents, fans leave with more than just the fights to look forward to. They delve deeper into the mindset of their favorite fighters, getting a glimpse of the intensely human aspect of this high-octane sport.

Watch This Story:  Is Nate Diaz Fighting Jake Paul in MMA After Losing His Boxing Match?