Home/Track & Field

Michael Johnson is on a mission to reshape the world of track racing, and he’s willing to put his money where his mouth is. $800,000 of it, to be exact. The four-time Olympic gold medalist is breaking away from the usual narratives, like the long-standing USA vs. Jamaica rivalry, to create something bigger, Grand Slam Track (GST). This revolutionary league isn’t just another addition to the sport; it’s a game-changer, stripping track down to its purest form of racing.

For Johnson, this isn’t just about competition. It’s about transformation. “I need to make it happen,” he insists, laser-focused on bringing his vision to life. And he’s all in. By investing his own money into GST, he’s proving that he’s not waiting for the system to change. He’s changing it himself. With just days until the final showdown, GST is already making waves, promising to deliver a new era of track and field where the spotlight shines solely on the thrill of the race.

Olympic medalist Rori Dunk shared a tweet on X, shedding light on just how radical Johnson’s vision is. “Michael Johnson just put $800K of his OWN money into GST. If that’s not commitment to changing track, I don’t know what is. The sport needs this shake-up!” Dunk’s words resonate deeply because they highlight the core of what makes GST different. Passion, investment, and a willingness to take risks. Johnson isn’t waiting for governing bodies or sponsors to step up; he’s leading the charge himself. By putting nearly a million dollars of his own money on the line, he’s signaling that he believes in GST not just as an experiment but as the future of track racing.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

Johnson’s investment signals a shift. One where athletes are no longer sidelined in the financial equation but placed at the very center. GST’s lucrative $12.6 million prize pool rivals payouts seen in other major sports, a bold move that underscores Johnson’s mission to elevate track racing’s status. “Delivering what athletes and fans have demanded,” he said to The Jamaica Gleaner on March 9, 2025, reinforcing the league’s athlete-first approach. This isn’t just about creating another race series; it’s about rewriting the playbook, ensuring runners are compensated fairly, and fans experience a high-stakes, adrenaline-pumping showdown.

But revolution doesn’t come without resistance. The Grand Slam Track faces steep logistical challenges that could test its long-term viability. Coordinating four high-profile events on a global scale, securing venues, and fitting GST into an already packed track calendar without clashing with powerhouse meets like the Diamond League. This will require precision. A single misstep could erode credibility.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

The battle over GST’s future and Johnson’s take on Track & Field legends

Johnson’s Grand Slam Track (GST) confronts two major obstacles beyond individual achievements because of opposition based on sporting philosophies and cultural values within athletics. The emphasis on racing has led GST to eliminate field events, which has sparked anger from athletes, especially Tara Davis, because they believe the league damages track and field. Jazmin Sawyers, together with Valarie Allman, disagree with GST’s approach because they feel leaving jumps and throws events out damages the balance of track and field while reducing sports spectacle.

What’s your perspective on:

Is Michael Johnson's GST the future of track, or a misguided attempt to change the sport?

Have an interesting take?

Short-term success of GST may be at risk because track enthusiasts remain at odds with people who support reforms. The successful revolution of the sport rests on two strategic pillars for Shaun Johnson, which include solving operational challenges as well as fostering a wider sense of sport unity instead of creating separation.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

On March 13, 2025, Michael Johnson sparked heated debate on X by listing the American track and field athletes who he believes have transcended the sport to true lasting stardom. His exclusive list included Jesse Owens, Edwin Moses, Bruce (Caitlyn) Jenner, Carl Lewis, Jackie Joyner-Kersee, Florence Griffith-Joyner (FloJo), and himself. While there’s no denying the greatness of these legends, naming yourself among them is a bold move. The tweet didn’t just celebrate icons; it posed an intriguing question. “What do we all have in common? And who will be next?

Johnson’s omission of current stars like Noah Lyles and Sha’Carri Richardson raised eyebrows, particularly given his past exchanges with Lyles. Many fans believe both athletes embody the charisma, dominance, and mainstream appeal that define their chosen names. The debate underscores a larger issue in track and field. Could Johnson’s decision to overlook today’s biggest American stars be tied to his broader mission with GST?

Have something to say?

Let the world know your perspective.

ADVERTISEMENT

0
  Debate

Debate

Is Michael Johnson's GST the future of track, or a misguided attempt to change the sport?

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT