Flipping, twisting, and soaring her way to the top of gymnastics, Jordan Chiles has done it all! In Paris, she helped Team USA claim gold in a moment of triumph. But while her teammates celebrated, another battle was brewing in the background—one she never expected to face. Her individual bronze medal hopes in the floor exercise ended in controversy after an arbitration court revoked her medal. The result felt off. And she fought back. Now, months later, as the gymnastics world waits for the final verdict, Chiles has dropped another bombshell—this time about her future in the sport.

In the past few months, Jordan Chiles has wrestled with emotions that have impacted her deeply which was evident when she spoke with Hoda Kotb in a heartfelt interview on Today back in November. “I feel like I recently have been trying to tell myself I’ve been OK, the past four, five months, and it’s honestly been a very, very difficult time,” Chiles admitted. “It’s hard to tell yourself that everything’s going to be fine when you know literally we didn’t do anything wrong.”

Fast forward to February, and Chiles stood at the 2025 TIME Women of the Year Gala, an event celebrating trailblazing women across industries. But even amid the glitz and recognition, she found herself at a crossroads. When asked by E! News about the possibility of competing at the LA 2028 Olympics, she responded with careful consideration. “It’s not a no and it’s not a yes,” she said. “I think my biggest thing is just taking it year by year, month by month, and then we’re gonna see.”

Chiles had a difficult few months. Oregon Native thought she had secured her moment of redemption after an initial score of 13.666 placed her outside the medals in the floor exercise final, Team USA submitted an inquiry, arguing she had been under-scored. Officials reviewed the footage, agreed she had missed credit for a key move, and adjusted her total to 13.766—just enough to push her into the bronze-medal position. But the celebration was short-lived!

Romania quickly challenged the decision! The International Olympic Committee (IOC) sided with them, claiming the objection came four seconds too late, overturning Chiles’ score change and stripping her of the bronze. With the ruling, Romania’s Ana Bărbosu (13.733) officially moved into third place, while her teammate Sabrina Voinea (13.700) climbed to fourth. The whole Saga had Chile’s reaction as well!

For the UCLA Bruins prodigy, it was “really hard to just comprehend.”. Despite the disappointment, Chiles has remained resilient, though she is limited in what she can publicly say about the ongoing legal battle. “I really can’t say too much about the bronze medal,” she explained. “I just know my attorneys are doing their best to figure everything out. I’m always going to fight and be my best self because that’s just who I am”.

Jordan Chiles’ Bronze Medal Controversy Takes a New Twist as Fresh Details Surface

Was the ruling fair? Was the panel unbiased? Jordan Chiles isn’t letting those questions fade into history. The American gymnast, who saw her Olympic bronze medal snatched away after a Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) ruling, is now fighting her biggest challenge yet—proving the case was flawed from the start.

“Everything was in the time that it needed to be, and for them to come back and say that it was four seconds late, when we’ve had proof, we’ve had everything that really can show that everything was right.”, she called out the decision on NBC’s Today show in November.

Her latest revelation? A shocking conflict of interest, As per Chiles. According to new filings revealed by Law 360, Chiles has called out Dr. Hamid D. Gharavi, the president of the CAS panel that ruled against her. Chiles also pointed out that he has a long-standing history of representing Romania in legal disputes—a fact that, she argues, should have disqualified him from presiding over her case against Romanian gymnast Ana Barbosu.

These details only surfaced after her January 7 brief was translated, making her claims clearer. [T]he great media attention and public criticism of Dr. Gharavi and the CAS Ad hoc Division illustrate how obvious the appearance of his bias was from the perspective of uninvolved third parties.”

And that’s not all. Chiles insists that crucial documents—like Gharavi’s declaration of independence—never reached Team USA’s legal team. If true, this detail dismantles a core argument from the Romanian Gymnastics Federation, which claimed Chiles had been informed of Gharavi’s ties well before the ruling.

Fast forward to February 2025, and the case is still ongoing. Stay tuned for the latest updates right here!