Home/NFL

via Getty

via Getty

Picture this: the early ’90s Dallas Cowboys, a juggernaut clad in silver and blue, hoisting Lombardi trophies like they were weekend groceries. Troy Aikman’s laser throws, Emmitt Smith’s unstoppable legs, and a swagger that made opponents sweat. It was an era of glory, grit, and… what could’ve been? Fast-forward three decades.

And the echoes of those triumphs now mingle with the ghosts of missed opportunities. But before we dive into the drama, let’s rewind to where it all began—with a coach, an owner, and a feud that changed NFL history.

Jimmy Johnson, the architect of Dallas’ ’90s dynasty, dropped a bombshell in a recent interview with Gio Journal. Reflecting on his career’s toughest challenge, he didn’t point to Super Bowl wins or Hall of Fame nods. Instead, he gut-punched Cowboys fans with a raw truth.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

“My most difficult time was going 1-15 in my first year as head coach of the Dallas Cowboys,” Johnson said. That 1989 season, a laughingstock 1–15 record, became the foundation for future greatness. But Johnson’s honesty cuts deeper. He admits the toll—sleepless nights, fractured relationships, and a rebuild so brutal it’d make Yellowstone’s Duttons flinch. Fast-forward to 2024…

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by Gio Journal (@gio_journal)

The Cowboys, fresh off a 7–10 season, shocked fans by promoting offensive coordinator Brian Schottenheimer to head coach. Critics scoffed. But not Johnson. “I think he’s an outstanding football coach, he’s got a great history as far as being in the league,” he told The Dallas Morning News, praising Schottenheimer’s game-planning chops. But Johnson’s support comes with a caveat: “Dak’s got to stay healthy.” Prescott’s durability? A ticking time bomb. Meanwhile, Dallas’ aging offensive line and shaky defense scream for reinforcements. Johnson’s advice?

“They got to rebuild that offensive line, they had some problems there… that’s where a lot of games are won and lost, being able to win in the trenches,” Jimmy suggested. Meanwhile, Johnson’s post-Cowboys journey? A Hall of Fame broadcasting career with FOX NFL Sunday. Teammates like Terry Bradshaw and Michael Strahan rib him about his coaching days, but Johnson’s insights remain razor-sharp.

What’s your perspective on:

Could the Cowboys have achieved a three-peat if Jimmy Johnson had stayed with the team?

Have an interesting take?

When asked about today’s NFL, he stresses player safety and competitiveness—echoing Strahan’s call to “protect the players.” Yet his heart still beats for coaching. “Long hours and to do it right, there’s little time for your family. It’s very stressful. Be ready for brutal criticism BUT if successful, VERY rewarding.” Besides, here’s where it stings…

Johnson and the three-peat that slipped away

After back-to-back Super Bowls in 1993 and 1994, Johnson and owner Jerry Jones clashed like titans. Egos flared. Jones famously declared he could win with or without Jimmy. By March 1994, Johnson was gone. The Cowboys hired Barry Switzer, stumbled in the 1995 NFC title game, and watched the 49ers steal their spotlight. Could Johnson have secured a three-peat?

“It’s hard to speculate,” he admits, but adds, “I know we had an extremely talented team, we had the youngest team in the NFL. A young team like that is going to only get better, and one thing I’ve always prided myself in is acquiring talent, and in my opinion, I would have brought in some players.” Translation: Yes, we could’ve made history. Besides, Jones and Johnson’s breakup wasn’t just a soap opera.

It altered NFL history. Kansas City now eyes a three-peat, a feat Dallas might’ve claimed 30 years ago. Johnson’s reflection? Pragmatic. “Smart players are one thing, and then obviously they’ve got to be talented, but playmakers, gym rats, people that love the game, that’s what I look for,” he says, referencing his 1989 draft picks (Aikman, Emmitt, Irvin). Today’s Cowboys?

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

via Imago

They’re betting on Schottenheimer’s X’s and O’s. Meanwhile, Prescott’s MVP-caliber flashes mean little if he’s sidelined. With a revamped offensive line (or lack thereof), Prescott’s survival hinges on front-office moves. Meanwhile, rivals like Philadelphia stack talent. Jimmy Johnson’s take? “Every team has got unique problems as far as paying their players, whether or not it be star players or trying to build a roster. Both of them have approached it the right way as far as keeping their great players.” That’s a good piece of advice.

Johnson’s blueprint for revival? “Win in the trenches.” Dallas’ 2024 line struggles cost them games. Rookie mistakes, veteran fatigue—it’s a mess. But Schottenheimer’s first test? The draft. Will he channel Johnson’s eye for “academic All-Americans” or chase flashy names?

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

Jimmy Johnson’s story is a tapestry of triumph, regret, and resilience. From the 1–15 infamy to back-to-back rings, his achievements have cemented his legacy. However, the what-if lingers. What if he and Jones had hugged it out? What if the three-peat had happened? For Cowboys fans, that wonder hurts just enough to keep hope alive.

Have something to say?

Let the world know your perspective.

ADVERTISEMENT

0
  Debate

Debate

Could the Cowboys have achieved a three-peat if Jimmy Johnson had stayed with the team?

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT