That was quite a game, you all. The Green Bay Packers rolled into the playoffs. That too, with a crushing 34-0 win over the Saints. And Matt LaFleur shifted his focus to the locker room culture after the shutout.
LaFleur emphasized the team’s upbeat spirit. “We’re getting contributions from a lot of different people. That’s usually the mark of a good team. I love the energy of our group,” he said. And the thrashing victory is a testament to the positive energy in the locker room.
Matt LaFleur thinks the #Packers are trending in the right direction.
“We’re getting contributions from a lot of different people. That’s usually the mark of a good team… I love the energy of our group.” pic.twitter.com/lgiz13HbNV
— Lily Zhao (@LilySZhao) December 24, 2024
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
Green Bay’s 34-0 domination over the Saints showcased this resilience amid injury concerns. Nine different players contributed rushing yards, and Jordan Love spread passes among seven targets, emphasizing depth across the roster. Love capped off with 182 yards and a touchdown. However, he suggested that the offense could have scored a few more points.
“I still think there’s a lot more points for us, a lot more big-time plays,” Love pointed out. Defensively? They kept the Saints at 0. What more do you need? The Packers made history by delivering the NFL’s first shutout of the season. They sacked rookie quarterback Spencer Rattler three times and forced two turnovers. The balance between offense and defense gives this team a playoff-ready edge. But at 11-4, the Packers find themselves in an unusual position.
This win cemented the Packers’ playoff spot, but the mood in Green Bay remains cautious. The Packers now need every weapon sharp to face a surging Vikings team, but with looming injuries, things look a bit difficult.
LaFleur gave updates on Jacobs and Watson
Post-game, LaFleur talked about the injuries, particularly the one related to Christian Watson’s knee. Watson’s knee injury during the second quarter left fans and teammates uneasy. “There’s some concern there, certainly,” LaFleur admitted. “We’re going to get some more testing done tomorrow, and hopefully I’ll have an answer for you tomorrow.” The team will run tests to get clarity, leaving Watson’s availability for the upcoming game against the Vikings in doubt.
Watson, with 620 receiving yards this season, has been pivotal for the Packers. Missing him in a key divisional matchup would hurt. Especially with Minnesota at 13-2 and leading the NFC North. Green Bay now has no room for missteps in these final weeks. However, LaFleur offered some good news regarding Josh Jacobs.
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
Despite speculation, Jacobs appears fine after his standout performance of 107 total yards and a touchdown. LaFleur praised Jacobs’ consistency and wants him ready against the Vikings. “He wanted to go back in, but there was no need for it,” he said, adding, “I actually told him at halftime that we’ll give you another series in the second half, but I want to get you out. Just being a short week, want to get him ready for Minnesota.” Jacobs’s presence surely balances the Packers’ offense. But with Watson’s tests pending, the spotlight shifts to the next man up.
Despite clinching the playoffs, they’re still chasing the Lions and Vikings in the division. Their next matchup against Minnesota will test their mettle and playoff aspirations. LaFleur remains optimistic, with contributions from every corner of the roster boosting their confidence.
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
As the Packers prepare for the Vikings, the focus remains clear: build on momentum and address the challenges head-on. Whether Watson suits up or not, Green Bay’s depth and energy will be crucial.
Have something to say?
Let the world know your perspective.
Debate
Can the Packers maintain their momentum if Christian Watson's knee injury sidelines him for long?
What’s your perspective on:
Can the Packers maintain their momentum if Christian Watson's knee injury sidelines him for long?
Have an interesting take?