Bengals‘ star quarterback, Joe Burrow, has made his stances clear about player retention. However, it’s not every day that an NFL veteran takes shots at a franchise owner. But that’s exactly what former Bengals lineman Andrew Whitworth did. The target? Mike Brown.

In a conversation on ESPN, Whitworth took aim at Cincinnati’s conservative roster-building philosophy. Comparing the Bengals to the Rams, he said, “Do you always have to live that world? I mean, look at what the Los Angeles Rams did… They took an aggressive time, a period of time that they said, ‘you know what, we’re gonna try and create a Super Bowl winner.’ They did it… Then they had a rough year that year [2022], and then they slowly kind of built themselves back.” Indeed, his critique echoes a sentiment long shared by fans, who often label the franchise as reluctant to make bold investments, especially in crucial windows like the one Joe Burrow is currently leading.

The Bengals’ history of being labeled “cheap” adds weight to Whitworth’s frustration. Despite drafting Burrow, Higgins, and Ja’Marr Chase, Cincinnati has often balked at retaining key players like Jessie Bates, who left in free agency. However, Whitworth’s pointed comments highlight the growing tension between maximizing Burrow’s prime and sticking to a cautious playbook. “Where’s the swing? Where’s the leverage?” He quipped. Meanwhile, Burrow isn’t staying silent either.

Joe Burrow knows exactly what he wants—Tee Higgins in Cincinnati. In a media session on Dec 11, the quarterback doubled down on his desire to keep Higgins, calling him a “need.” Furthermore, when asked about his feelings if the Bengals failed to re-sign Tee, Joe added, “I’d be very disappointed in that.” This vocal endorsement puts additional pressure on the front office to not only prioritize Higgins but also shake off their reputation for cautious spending. Hence, the situation becomes more complex as Higgins enters free agency this offseason.

His recent split from agent David Mulugheta signals a pivotal moment. And Burrow’s public plea creates high stakes for the Bengals’ decision-making. Will Cincinnati step up to keep its receiving trio intact, or will the franchise’s conservative tendencies prevail?

Whitworth’s call for bold moves reflects broader frustration

Could the Bengals be missing out on big opportunities by playing it too safe? If you ask Andrew Whitworth, the answer is a loud, resounding yes. Whitworth didn’t just stop at critiquing Cincinnati’s current approach. He brought up his own playoff years with the Bengals.

“When I look back at my time… We went to the playoffs every year. We won multiple division championships… But did we ever make that just one free agent? Just one splash-free agent during that time? Or one big trade for somebody who kind of took you over the ledge?” His comments struck a chord with fans who’ve long felt the team prioritizes stability over seizing championship opportunities.

Burrow’s presence makes the Bengals perennial contenders. However, the clock is ticking, and the quarterback’s massive contract may limit the team’s flexibility. Yet many argue that investing in Higgins and Chase is non-negotiable. “Joe Burrow, Jamar Chase, T. Higgins… Let’s go for it, right here in this window, let’s go for it,” Andrew Whitworth emphasized.

Players like Chase and Higgins are rare, but retaining them requires a shift in mindset. Furthermore, Burrow’s endorsement of Higgins as essential is not just a personal statement; it’s an urge to the front office.

For Bengals fans, the hope is that the franchise learns to balance calculated risks with long-term stability. And the offseason will reveal whether Cincinnati is ready to take that leap.