Home/College Football

Ever watched a man lay out facts so clean they leave no room for argument, only for the system to curve him, anyway? That’s Lane Kiffin right now, the irony. Both Ole Miss and Alabama sit at 9-3, but somehow, the Tide’s name keeps coming up whenever there’s a talk about the playoffs. Kiffin’s had enough, hopping on Twitter with receipts to prove why his Rebels deserve the spot over Bama. And guess what? Analysts like David Pollack and Josh Pate are backing him on his plea. Kiffin’s got stats that hit harder than an SEC linebacker. Is the system rigged for the big brands? Or it’s just Lane Kiffin stirring the pots in all directions?

David Pollack is always ready to call it as he sees it, the guy’s too cool to sugarcoat things. Pollack dropped his take on his YouTube Live. “If you want me to take ole miss. Let’s say, ole miss was in [don’t have any blowout loss] every single game they played.. Ole miss has more impressive win against higher ranked team with Georgia [bulldogs] ole miss had losses, they lost to bad team…so did Alabama, But Ole miss never got stopped but Alabama did. Again I’m making the case Ole Miss.” Pollack wasn’t just throwing stats around—he was questioning every criterion being used. Pollack’s argument hinged on two things: consistency and perspective. Ole Miss never laid an egg; they kept every game competitive, even in losses. Unlike Alabama, they got their back blown by off-beat Oklahoma Sooners. You can make cases for both teams, but Lane Kiffin’s Rebels got an edge here.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

Then came Josh Pate on his podcast, ‘Josh Pate’s College Football Show’ bringing even more heat: “I wouldn’t have bama in, I’d have Ole Miss in over all of em. Because there is a part of me…still thinks that Ole Miss at their best is better than all these teams.” Pate’s reasoning wasn’t just statistics; it was about pure eye tests and logic. He argued that Ole Miss, when they’re rolling, is a juggernaut that could outshine Alabama’s tide. With two top analysts backing Kiffin’s plea, it’s no wonder social media is buzzing with Rebel fans crying foul.

Who deserves the playoff spot: Bama or Lane Kiffin’s Ole Miss?

Alright, let’s break it down like Lane Kiffin would on Twitter or X. Statistically preaching, Ole Miss low-key holds the edge: a +296 scoring margin compared to Alabama’s +252. In losses, Ole Miss only slipped by 13 points total, while Alabama got dragged for a -33-point differential. That’s very Alabama-unlike. And when it came down to common SEC Ops? Ole Miss clapped South Carolina by 24 points while Bama barely made it out alive with a 2-point dub.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

What’s your perspective on:

Is the playoff system rigged for big brands like Alabama, leaving Ole Miss in the shadows?

Have an interesting take?

If meritocracy ruled the playoffs, Ole Miss would be in without question. They’ve been more consistent, more dominant, and they’ve got better wins. But this isn’t just about what happens on the field—it’s about who can sell tickets, draw ratings, and carry the playoff spotlight. Alabama’s brand is just too big to ignore. Is it even playoffs when Alabama ain’t playing in it?

Lane Kiffin can scream into the Twitter void all he wants, and honestly? He’s not wrong. But if this comes down to politics, don’t act surprised when Bama sneaks in, if SMU beats Clemson in the ACC conference title game. But until the playoff committee weighs more on performance over prestige, Ole Miss fans might have to settle for being the better team on paper.

Have something to say?

Let the world know your perspective.

0
  Debate

Debate

Is the playoff system rigged for big brands like Alabama, leaving Ole Miss in the shadows?