Home/College Football

Picture this: college football is teetering on the edge, barely held together by duct tape and a prayer. Lawsuits are piling up, NIL money is flowing uncontrollably, and the rulebook seems to be changing every other week. Chaos reigns. But Shane Beamer? He’s not the one changing—he’s the one stepping into the fire. Fresh off a 9-4 season with South Carolina, Beamer now finds himself in a critical position ahead of Tuesday’s House hearing. The stakes? They’ve never been higher. And he’s not shy about warning everyone of the storm brewing on the horizon.

On Tuesday, South Carolina head coach Shane Beamer will be among the witnesses at Capitol Hill, testifying at the House Subcommittee on Commerce, Manufacturing, and Trade hearing on NIL and college sports. The hearing, titled “Moving the Goalposts: How NIL is Reshaping College Athletics,” was scheduled by Rep. Gus Bilirakis, who chairs the subcommittee. Beamer has already started making his case, with his pre-written testimony confirmed by Ross Dellenger. His message? If lawmakers don’t act soon, “college sports will be destroyed by never-ending litigation and conflicting state laws.”

Right now, NIL is a free-for-all. With each state setting its own regulations and lawsuits cropping up left and right, the system is completely fractured. Beamer argues that without a unified national law to set clear guidelines, the current mess will only get worse. And he’s not alone in this fight. Illinois athletic director Josh Whitman, Duke track athlete Emily Cole, Abilene Christian’s Anthony Egbo, and former Clemson offensive lineman Justin Falcinelli—who now serves as vice president of the College Football Players Association—will also testify at the hearing.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

 

This will be the first NIL-related hearing since Republicans took full control of Congress and the White House. Back in November, On3 reported that Sen. Ted Cruz was already drafting new NIL legislation after meetings with Power Four schools. Now, with the political landscape shifting, this hearing is expected to be a key moment for lawmakers like Bilirakis to gather opinions before pushing forward with potential legislation. In January 2024, Bilirakis introduced the FAIR College Sports Act, a bill aimed at bringing some order to NIL chaos.

Meanwhile, the NCAA is trying to clean up its own mess. As part of the House v. NCAA settlement agreement, the NCAA is working to establish a new enforcement entity—one with court backing—to limit the power of NIL collectives. The lawsuit, which dates back to June 2020, was brought by Grant House and Sedona Price, who accused the NCAA of antitrust violations and unjust enrichment. The settlement has added a new wrinkle: a third-party clearinghouse will now monitor NIL deals exceeding $600. The NCAA, in turn, is rushing to create a court-approved watchdog to oversee NIL collectives more closely. But even with these measures in place, Congress will need to step in, or state laws will continue to override any settlement agreements.

Beamer, for his part, is pushing for a federal law to codify the settlement and maintain an education-based model for college sports. He highlights a key reality: less than 2% of student-athletes make it to the pros. His concern is ensuring that all student-athletes have the right tools for life after sports. “The system is long overdue for change; the current situation is unsustainable,” Beamer states. “A national, bipartisan federal law will provide equal opportunity for all student-athletes to benefit from NIL and create a uniform standard to ensure we’re playing by the same rules.” Well, Beamer has also got his own agenda, one that extends beyond the legislative arena.

What’s your perspective on:

Should the SEC get automatic playoff spots, or is Beamer's call just wishful thinking?

Have an interesting take?

Shane Beamer’s firm stand for change

Beamer isn’t just making waves on Capitol Hill—he’s also calling for major changes in the college football playoff system. He’s been vocal about his frustration with how the SEC is treated, particularly after South Carolina’s 2024 season. The Gamecocks had some standout moments, including a gutsy 17-14 win over Clemson—the eventual ACC champions—on their home turf. Despite that victory, South Carolina didn’t make the playoffs.

Meanwhile, Georgia, Texas, and Tennessee all made the playoffs but fell short of winning the national title. Beamer didn’t mince words when discussing the situation: “The fact of the matter is, we beat the ACC champion on their field this year and didn’t get in… I do believe this league is just different than others, and there has to be some consideration.” His solution? The SEC deserves automatic playoff spots.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

Analyst Josh Pate has weighed in on the issue, suggesting that South Carolina might have a legitimate shot at the playoffs and even a national championship in the future. However, he’s not entirely convinced they have what it takes to win it all, pointing to the brutal SEC schedule and some uncertainties in their roster. If the Gamecocks want to break through, they’ll need quarterback LaNorris Sellers to step up in a big way. Pate also highlighted an inconsistency in Beamer’s squad: “There was a lot of randomness in the caliber of quarterback play.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

But before Beamer can tackle that issue, he has another battle to fight. And that fight takes place at the Rayburn House Office Building, where he’ll make his case for the future of college sports. Looks like someone is not backing down, whether it’s on the field or in the halls of Congress.

Have something to say?

Let the world know your perspective.

ADVERTISEMENT

0
  Debate

Debate

Should the SEC get automatic playoff spots, or is Beamer's call just wishful thinking?

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT