The landscape of CFB is on the verge of a seismic shift, and the courtroom is where the next chapter will be written. The House vs. NCAA settlement is set to be heard this week, a case that could forever change how college athletes are compensated. For the first time, schools will be required to share revenue directly with players, a concept that was once unthinkable in the world of amateur athletics. The NCAA’s grip on player compensation has been weakening for years, but now, with the potential for a landmark decision looming on April 7, the floodgates may be about to open. Coaches, conferences, and analysts across the sport are bracing for impact, and Georgia Bulldogs HC Kirby Smart is sounding the alarm.

But while Kirby Smart is urging caution, others are questioning why the top conferences—the SEC and Big Ten—haven’t already taken control of the chaos. Insiders from The Ruffino & Joe Show weren’t holding back. If tampering is such a major issue, why aren’t the biggest power brokers in the sport doing something about it? That was the heart of their argument. “I have been screaming from the rafters on this show and on Twitter and everywhere—why in the world wouldn’t the SEC and the Big Ten go after these guys or these agents and say, ‘Listen, you better stop, or we’re going to give you a cease and desist. We’re going to tell players not to be represented by you,’” said Blake Ruffino. It’s not like the conferences don’t have rules in place. The SEC and Big Ten explicitly prohibit tampering by their own bylaws, meaning that if they wanted to, they could start enforcing these rules tomorrow.

“If the NCAA doesn’t want to do anything about tampering and Greg Sankey and Tony Petitti are all like, ‘Hey, we want regulation,’” Then why don’t they just enforce the rules already on the books? That’s where the frustration lies. The analysts didn’t mince words, calling out what they saw as hypocrisy. “I call BS when they come out here and say they want legislation—no, they don’t. No, they do not.” It’s not just about philosophy—it’s about enforcement. Ruffino pointed out that these same conferences have been more than willing to crack down on player movement when it benefits them. He used an example from the Big Ten, where an in-conference transfer after the spring window is automatically met with a one-year sit-out rule.

“If a player went in the spring portal—let’s say I go to Ohio State and I wanted to go to Penn State because Jim Knowles went there – [like] – I tried to stick it out at Ohio State, I didn’t want to do it, but now I want to go to Penn State. The Big Ten would make me sit out a year if I transfer to Penn State.” The SEC has similar rules, preventing in-conference movement after the portal closes. “Why aren’t they going after tampering with the same energy?” That’s the real question. If conferences can control player movement when it suits them, why aren’t they cracking down on outside forces meddling in their rosters? Ruffino summed it up bluntly: “They could go after this. I feel like they’re deciding not to.”

While others are pointing fingers, Kirby Smart is urging patience. The UGA coach is well aware of the storm brewing, and he isn’t pretending to have all the answers. But he does know one thing—college football is in a precarious state, and everyone needs to take a step back. “I think everybody’s got to take a big pause right now and say, ‘Deep breath,’ because what’s going on in basketball right now is crazy,” Smart said. He’s not wrong. The chaos in the basketball transfer portal, where NIL money and tampering are rampant, is a preview of what could come for football.

The April 7 settlement date looms large, and even someone as plugged-in as Smart admits that uncertainty is gripping the sport. “We don’t know everything that’s going to come out with April 7,” he continued. “Might be April 7, might be the settlement date where we get a lot more information. But everybody’s on pins and needles because we don’t know exactly what’s going to come out of this.”

Until then, Kirby Smart is sticking to what he knows best—recruiting players who actually want to be at Georgia, not just players looking for the highest NIL bidder. “What I do know is we’re going to continue to recruit people who love football, who are passionate about football, and don’t put money as the No. 1 answer,” he said. “I’ve never met a really good player that that’s all they care about.”

That’s an old-school philosophy in a new-age sport. But Smart isn’t backing down. He wants guys who buy into the program, not just the paycheck. “The 105 number, the NIL number, ‘What’s the cap number? What’s this going to be?’” he said, dismissing the obsession with NIL figures. It’s a shot across the bow in a sport that’s rapidly shifting toward a business-first mentality.

The reality is simple—college football is at a crossroads. Smart sees it. The analysts see it. And yet, the biggest conferences in the sport are still hesitant to act. That hesitation could prove costly.

Kirby Smart sounds the alarm

If you thought the NIL and the transfer portal had already turned college football into a free-for-all, buckle up—because Kirby Smart just pulled back the curtain on what’s really happening behind the scenes.

Speaking ahead of what could be a historic April for the sport, Smart revealed that actual agents are setting up Zoom calls to “present” college athletes to potential suitors—before they even enter the portal. “There’s stuff going on right now in college football,” Smart said. “There’s people reaching out to have a Zoom call and present all the players they represent that are on teams, including our teams.”

Yeah, you read that right. Players are being shopped before they even declare. “And they want to invite people to the Zooms so they can watch and see who’s going in the portal or shopping who’s in the portal before the portal,” Smart continued. “Do you want to get on a Zoom and look at all these players? What if some of them are mine?” That’s full-blown tampering—and it’s happening right out in the open.

With the House vs. NCAA settlement allowing schools to directly share $20.5 million with athletes next year, the question remains: Will that be enough to stop this madness?