
USA Today via Reuters
Credit: USA Today Network

USA Today via Reuters
Credit: USA Today Network
After months of disappointing losses and shattered NCAA Tournament hopes Hoosiers fans will get to see Mike Woodson’s time as head coach come to an end. The Indiana legend, at 66, will reportedly retire after this season and conclude a four-year episode of long struggle stretches. Yet this is not the clean break it seems thanks to the $8 million buyout that has people buzzing.
Woodson’s contract, which was renegotiated just last year, has a significant buyout clause. If Indiana were to fire him, they’d need to pay the full remaining balance—around $8 million. Thankfully (or perhaps not), the university can pay this off in $1 million annual installments. But this setup has raised questions. Why hasn’t Indiana moved on from Woodson sooner? The money, of course, plays a big part in that decision.
As Jacob Goins, host of Locked On Hoosiers, pointed out, the situation is a bit of a head-scratcher: “My question though is why wait? You’ve got an $8 million buyout. If Indiana fires him, they’ve got to pay it all. Maybe they’re trying to solve this thing nicely.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
When Woodson was hired back in 2021, it seemed like a perfect fit for the Hoosiers. He was coming off as an assistant coach to the New York Knicks, following his role as a coach for 6 more NBA teams. There was a tone of eagerness and respect when Director of Athletics Scott Dolson had made the announcement. “As one of our program’s legendary players, Mike certainly gives us a bridge to our past… I’m thrilled about what this day means for our program,” were his words.
Poll of the day
Poll 1 of 5
Is Indiana's decision to let Mike Woodson retire instead of firing him the right move?
Yes, it preserves his legacy
No, they should have fired him sooner
It's all about the money
Not sure
Do you believe Chamarri Conner's success is more due to his natural talent or the support from his parents?
Natural talent
Parental support
Both equally
Not sure
Whats your Perspective on:
Should Indiana have cut ties with Woodson sooner, or is mutual respect worth the $8 million?
Have an interesting take?
Was the media's focus on Quincy Wilson's loss rather than Andrew Salvodon's record-breaking win justified?
Yes, Wilson was the favorite
No, Salvodon deserved the spotlight
Media always chases drama
Not sure
Do you believe there should be more transparency in the investigation of Adan Manzano's tragic death?
Yes, the public deserves answers
No, respect the family's privacy
It's too soon to tell
Not sure
Is Creed Humphrey the unsung hero behind the Kansas City Chiefs' recent success?
Absolutely, he deserves more credit
No, it's all about Mahomes
It's a team effort
Not sure
Want to dive deeper?
Here are the articles that inspired recent polls.
AD
What transpired next, however, did not meet their goals. The Hoosiers have failed to make it to make it to Sweet Sixteen even once under the HC and are likely to be missing out on the NCAA tournament appearance for the second consecutive time. So while the recent announcement was a foreseen sight, Goins believes there is still mutual respect there that hasn’t let both parties escalate things.
“Maybe Indiana is trying to take care of Mike Woodson, and maybe Mike Woodson is trying to take care of Indiana. Maybe they don’t want to put the ‘fired’ label on it,” the host continues. Obviously, both sides are treading treacherous territory, looking for a way to split without a mess.
Retirement is a chance for Woodson to go out on his own terms and still be remembered as a beloved alum. For Indiana, it avoids the bad optics of letting go of a program icon while keeping the financial blow a little softer. At least in theory, this mutual understanding is beneficial for both sides.
Mike Woodson, 66, seems to be leaning toward stepping away for good rather than looking for another coaching gig elsewhere. For Indiana, Woodson’s voluntary resignation would save them from the negative publicity of a firing. Also, it could even reduce the overall financial cost. For Woodson, retiring allows him to preserve his legacy as a respected figure in Indiana basketball history.
What’s your perspective on:
Should Indiana have cut ties with Woodson sooner, or is mutual respect worth the $8 million?
Have an interesting take?
Mike Woodson’s departure after a disastrous campaign
The Mike Woodson’s decision comes after a particularly rough 2024-25 season. In which Indiana’s preseason ambitions of being a top team were dashed in spectacular fashion. Despite landing top transfers like Oumar Ballo from Arizona and Myles Rice from Washington State, the Hoosiers fell apart under Woodson’s watch.
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad

via Imago
Credit: IMAGN
They went 0-10 against ranked teams in the last two seasons. And their latest late season collapse, including losing six of their last seven, ensured no NCAA tournament berth again.
With Woodson’s departure essentially assured, Indiana is about to go on its third coaching hunt in the last decade. Possible replacements include Dusty May, the Michigan head coach who once worked as an Indiana student manager. Chris Beard, the head coach at Ole Miss and a disciple of Bob Knight, and TJ Otzelberger, the rising star and head coach at Iowa State.
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
The Hoosiers haven’t won a national title since 1987, and their last Big Ten championship was in 2016. This saga is just another chapter in the story of a proud program trying to get back to its former glory. Now with a new coach probably on the way, Indiana will need more than a new face to climb back onto track. They’ll need a plan that can help them reclaim their perch in the school basketball powerhouses.
Have something to say?
Let the world know your perspective.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Debate
Should Indiana have cut ties with Woodson sooner, or is mutual respect worth the $8 million?