The Lakers are no strangers to playoff pressure. They’ve got the squad that knows what it takes to win at the highest level. Historically, they’ve dominated the Timberwolves in the postseason, winning 8 of their 12 playoff matchups, including a 4-2 series victory in the 2004 Western Conference Finals. But this playoff season, the script has changed, and the Timberwolves howled their way up. 

The Timberwolves shocked the Lakers in Game 1, blowing them out 117–95. Jaden McDaniels dropped 25 points, and Anthony Edwards nearly had a triple-double, while the Lakers struggled on both ends. Despite Luka Dončić’s impressive 37-point debut for the Lakers, the Timberwolves’ depth and execution proved overwhelming.

With inconsistent offense and defense, LA’s playoff hopes are facing challenges. To add some perspective, an NBA legend has shared his thoughts, bringing attention to the situation and sparking discussion about the team’s future. The Timberwolves’ decisive Game 1 victory served as a stark reminder that past playoff dominance offers no guarantees against a hungry, rising team.

Matt Barnes was definitely caught off guard by the way the Timberwolves handled the Lakers in Game 1. While he wasn’t shocked they won, he was “surprised in the fashion that they won.” The Lakers’ defense looked porous, allowing Minnesota to shoot 50% from beyond the arc and over 51% from the field—definitely not a good look for a team with championship aspirations. But Barnes was quick to remind us, “They’re not gonna shoot 50% from the 3-point line the rest of the series,” suggesting that the Timberwolves’ hot shooting might not be sustainable.

Luka Doncic delivered an impressive performance, scoring 37 points, grabbing 8 rebounds, and adding 1 assist. However, what really had Barnes “concerned” was the 25-6 gap in fastbreak points, particularly considering the Lakers’ aging roster. He highlighted how crucial this was for a team that’s not as quick as it once was. He also touched on Luka, noting that while he’s still dynamic on the offensive end, defensively, he’s showing some signs of slowing down. “Luka’s never really been one for lateral speed or defense,” Barnes explained, signaling a potential issue for the Lakers as the series moves forward.

Barnes entrusts JJ Redick to prepare the team for game 2 and fix what went wrong. So, what really went wrong for the Lakers in Game 1? Was it the defense, the fast break struggles, or something deeper? We’ll inspect where they faltered and how they can adjust for the rest of the series.

Timberwolves’ physicality exposes Lakers’ weakness

Anthony Edwards made a huge impact with 22 points, 9 assists, and 8 rebounds. Coach Chris Finch called it the “best version of Ant,” especially with his “triple-double” and leadership down the stretch. “He was vocal, showing great leadership,” Finch added.

The Lakers started strong with a seven-point lead, but the middle quarters were a nightmare. “They blitzed us in that second quarter,” LeBron James said. The Timberwolves took full advantage with their transition play, led by Julius Randle: “We blew the game open with our transition off stops.” This performance underscores the Timberwolves’ ability to capitalize on fast-break opportunities. 

Despite Rudy Gobert’s strong presence, Reid showed he could be a key contributor, especially when the Wolves needed offense. Edwards acknowledged the team’s depth, saying, “We got a good group of guys,” pointing out their growing momentum after an early-season struggle. “It took us a minute to get going this season, but now we’re rolling.”

The bigger issue? Lakers coach JJ Redick pointed out. “We have to do a lot of things better, and it starts with playing harder and being more organized.” Redick also noted their mental lapses and disorganized play: “It’s remarkable how many possessions we had four guys, three, four guys at halfcourt with 15 on the [shot] clock.” It’s safe to say the Lakers’ lack of response to Minnesota’s physicality led to their downfall.

Also, L.A.’s bench was a major issue, outscored 43-13 by Minnesota’s. “I believe we have eight starter-caliber players,” Finch said. The Lakers’ lack of size and struggling role players were evident, with the Wolves outscoring them in the paint by 12 and out rebounding them by six.

As the series continues, the Lakers will have to work on their defense and bench issues. With Matt Barnes pointing out key concerns, it’s clear adjustments are necessary. The Timberwolves’ physicality and depth have set the bar high—can LA rise to the challenge?