Home/NBA

via Imago

via Imago

Nike’s $5000 fines to NBA for Air Jordan 1: a scam or the biggest move in the history of product marketing? You’ve probably heard the legendary story if you’ve followed sneaker culture even a little. The NBA, led by then-commissioner David Stern, supposedly disapproved of Michael Jordan‘s black and red sneakers, slapping him with a $5,000 fine for every game he wore them. Nike, in turn, enthusiastically paid the fine, using the controversy to fuel one of the most brilliant advertising campaigns in sports history. Sounds like an epic story, right? Well, what if we told you Nike never paid a dime?

Hardcore sneakerheads would know that the letter of notice from the NBA, often associated with AJ1 “Banned” sneakers, was meant for Air Ship the Chicago Bulls legend wore in his rookie season. But not many fans might know Michael Jordan never wore the AJ 1 “Banned” sneakers to regular season games.

“The truth is he never actually played an official regular season game in the black and red pair, by all measures of research — meaning there was no fine to pay,” read a recent article by the Boardroom. This implies the notion that Nike paid $5000 fines for MJ to wear “Banned” sneakers is a complete lie.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

So, what was Michael Jordan actually wearing most of the time? For the majority of his early NBA days, he played in white-based colorways that followed the league’s rules. When he did switch it up, he rocked the NBA-approved “Chicago” and “Black Toe” versions of the Air Jordan 1. The only time the “Banned” colorway made a real on-court appearance? The 1985 Dunk Contest, when His Airness put on a show.

The revelation from the Boardroom comes amid the upcoming re-release of AJ1 “Banned” sneakers. Since its original release in April 1985, the “Banned” has only dropped six times. The last release came in 2016, and in 2011, Nike added an ‘X’ to the heel, leaning into the “Banned” nickname even more.

Reissues also came in 1994 and 2013. However, with the 2025 release coming up, Nike gained major buzz around the sneakers. Thanks to their marketing campaigns that started in December last year. It followed by putting black tile bricks on his United Center statue, further promoting AJ1.

What’s your perspective on:

Did Nike's 'Banned' story fool us all, or was it genius marketing at its finest?

Have an interesting take?

Even though the shoes on the statue are Jordan 9s, the marketing worked. And the biggest move in the campaign was the recent commercial from Nike.

Nike creates a commercial re-imagining NBA if they never paid the supposed $5000 fines

Imagine this—no Air Jordans. No sneaker culture. No kids begging their parents for the latest drops. Sounds absurd, right? Well, that’s exactly the alternate reality Jordan Brand played in its latest commercial. You probably know the story by now. In 1985, the NBA warned Michael Jordan his black-and-red sneakers violated league rules.

The claim that Nike made? They paid the $5,000 fine every game. This turned the controversy into marketing gold. But now, Jordan Brand has thrown out a wild question with its latest commercial: What if Nike didn’t pay the fine?

The ad starts with a nostalgic clip of young MJ from the original Banned commercial before cutting to a fictional Nike finance guy, Lawrence H. His take? “It was $5,000—every game.” And that’s where things spiral out of control.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

 

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by Nice Kicks (@nicekicks)

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

The Air Jordan? A flop. Signature sneakers? Never a thing. No sneaker culture, no Luka Doncic rocking a pair of Js on the global stage. Then the ad goes full chaos mode—“there’s no sports channel,” “red isn’t cool,” and “no one knows those letter numbers” (a hilarious nod to the Roman numerals on Jordans). All because Letterman H. denied paying those $5000 fines.

Nike’s message with the commercial? Jordan Brand didn’t just sell shoes—it shaped sports, culture, and history. The commercial has surely created a major buzz. Brilliant move. Especially considering the $5000 fines were never actually paid.

Have something to say?

Let the world know your perspective.

ADVERTISEMENT

0
  Debate

Debate

Did Nike's 'Banned' story fool us all, or was it genius marketing at its finest?

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT