Home/NBA
feature-image

via Imago

feature-image

via Imago

The Golden State Warriors’ Game 4 clash with the Houston Rockets was anything but ordinary. Tensions erupted in the second quarter, tempers flared, and multiple technicals were assessed—including one to Stephen Curry, whose rare emotional outburst had fans wondering if he was finally embracing a “villain” role. But after the dust settled, Curry himself shut that narrative down with classic honesty, reminding everyone why he’s always been true to himself, chaos or not.

The Warriors ended up winning the war on the scoreboard, but the bigger story became a firestorm of fouls, flagrant behavior, and Curry’s viral taunt that sparked a league-wide debate.

Midway through the second quarter, the drama exploded. After Curry drew a foul on Dillon Brooks, the two tangled for possession, with Brooks tugging on the ball post-whistle. That brief scuffle was enough to summon Draymond Green, who immediately inserted himself into the fray, shoving Brooks and escalating tensions.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

All three—Curry, Brooks, and Green—were handed technical fouls. But Curry’s role came under the microscope. After the foul, the usually calm superstar held up two fingers in Brooks’ direction, seemingly reminding him of his foul count. It was a subtle taunt, but enough to warrant a tech.

Reggie Miller, calling the game, chimed in with an eyebrow-raising remark: “You could say that Curry started it all… If he doesn’t do that, maybe Brooks doesn’t swipe at the ball.

article-image

via Imago

The referees agreed, penalizing Curry. But for once, it wasn’t Draymond who looked like the primary instigator—it was Steph. And social media immediately began spinning a new narrative: was the baby-faced assassin finally stepping into the villain role?

After the game, Curry addressed the scuffle, the taunt, and the growing online chatter about his supposed shift in demeanor. When asked directly if the taunting was a sign of a new chapter—becoming a “villain” version of Steph—he quickly shut it down: “I’m not going, as I am actually,” Curry said with a smirk. “That was so stupid because he had done it literally the play before. And I just returned the favor, but they didn’t see him. They saw me. It’s like siblings—the second ones will get in trouble. So that was me.

More chaos followed. Just minutes later, Draymond and Tari Eason got tangled up diving for a loose ball. Draymond’s legs ended up wrapped around Eason’s head, and the All-Defensive forward grabbed onto his jersey for good measure. Green was assessed a Flagrant 1, while Eason received a tech for standing over him afterward.

What’s your perspective on:

Is Stephen Curry's taunt a sign of a new 'villain' era, or just playoff passion?

Have an interesting take?

It was Draymond’s second borderline incident of the series, after having smacked Alperen Şengün in the face in Game 2—but the spotlight was now drifting toward Curry’s attitude.

Curry postgame interview speaks a lot

It was classic Steph—honest, light-hearted, and self-aware. He didn’t deny his competitiveness, but he also made it clear he wasn’t reinventing himself into someone he’s not.

Curry was asked a broader question about what’s more agonizing in late-game moments: needing to score or needing to get a stop? “It was an excellent question,” Curry said, pausing to thank the reporter. “It’s more agonizing… I mean, defense for sure, just because you don’t have as much control, I think. Y’all probably asked Draymond—it’s the opposite answer. But that’s how we see the game. So either way, you feel like you can do enough to get over the hump and make a play to win a game.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

Then Curry reflected on a late-game shot he missed: “I think I had missed that little floater to try to go up three. And I felt like I missed an opportunity to give us a little bit of a cushion. I’m sure Draymond on the other end was like, ‘Alright, it’s my turn.’ And he answered the call. It was unbelievable to watch.

article-image

via Imago

That moment captured the Warriors’ dynamic in a nutshell—Steph, the offensive surgeon, and Draymond, the defensive bulldog, each trusting the other to close the job.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

Despite the chaos, technicals, and growing heat of playoff emotions, Stephen Curry isn’t changing who he is. His brief moment of taunting wasn’t the beginning of a villain era—it was a response, a heat-of-the-battle gesture that got misread by refs and fans alike. As always, Curry remains the same: intense, passionate, but true to his core.

The Rockets may have poked the bear. But if they were hoping to awaken a villain, all they got was a fired-up version of the same Curry who’s been haunting them for a decade.

ADVERTISEMENT

0
  Debate

"Is Stephen Curry's taunt a sign of a new 'villain' era, or just playoff passion?"

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT