Home/NBA

USA Today via Reuters

USA Today via Reuters

“Yeah. I plan on playing every game.” LeBron James made an ambitious claim at the start of the season, aiming to stay available for his team every night. However, he was unable to keep his word after 23 appearances as he sat out back-to-back games because of a foot injury. As expected, the week-long hiatus rejuvenated King James, and the legend returned in much better form. Seeing the benefits of appropriate rest has led him to change his stance about load management despite Kevin Garnett’s recent criticism.

Addressing his recent absence from action, LBJ said in today’s presser, “I’m just not a guy that likes to sit games if I’m somewhat healthy. It’s never been my thing. But no, I see what you’re saying- if there’s an opportunity where it can benefit my body and benefit my play long-term for the better of the team, then I’m always open to having that conversation.” Well, James looked far more athletic and energized in his latest appearance, thanks to the week-long rest. It helped him lead his team to victory against the Grizzlies.

So, don’t be surprised if you see LeBron sitting out more games in the future, prioritizing the long-term goal. Unfortunately, this philosophy gives weight to what Kevin Garnett said in a recent interview. Indirectly, pointing to LeBron and Embiid as recent examples, the C’s legend criticized the league’s load management issue, “It used to mean something when you played through an injury… You never had your best player on the team say, ‘I’m not playing back-to-back.’”

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

He was referring to Embiid’s early season claim about never playing back-to-back games again. KG continued, “It don’t go like that to go to the room where you sit amongst the greats and you in the middle of all the gods. Them gods didn’t get here by doing that (load management). That ain’t the way we made this… This thing of ours wasn’t built like that.”

Of course, KG was widely known as one of the toughest players in the NBA during his heyday. But LeBron James’ change in stance should honestly not be frowned upon, considering what he is consistently doing at age 39.

LeBron James’ 2-game break was a calculated move!

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

Turns out, LeBron did not just miss two games out of nowhere. It was in fact ‘planned’. “I mean, the schedule presented it… I looked at the schedule and between now and All-Star, there’s not many opportunities. I think we play every other day in January or some s— like that.” Yes, the 4x champ would not have gotten a better opportunity to take time off. He only missed 2 games but got to rest for a week, thanks to the NBA Cup festivities. And as James pointed out, the Lakers’ schedule for the next two months or so is jam-packed.

via Imago

What’s your perspective on:

At 39, should LeBron James be criticized for resting, or praised for his enduring performance?

Have an interesting take?

So, this was the perfect time for him to rest and recover from his lingering injuries. Although KG’s criticism might be justified for some superstars who spend more time on the bench than on the court, LeBron James should be exempted from such cases.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

That’s because ‘The Chosen One’ is already doing what no 39-year-old NBA player has ever done before. At an age where most players are quite a few years into their retirement or mere bench warmers, James is still The Man on his Lakers team, averaging 22.8 points and over 9 assists. Moreover, he hardly takes time off even at this age as he played 71 games last season.

So, King James should be the last guy to be criticized for load management because he always gives his all on the court and stays available whenever his team needs him. Do you agree?

Have something to say?

Let the world know your perspective.

0
  Debate

Debate

At 39, should LeBron James be criticized for resting, or praised for his enduring performance?