After the resounding success of the Superstar Racing Experience, Tony Stewart could hardly have foreseen the rollercoaster to come. The unexpected twist? Not having a single driver in the playoffs of the 2023 Cup Series. And when victory finally seemed within grasp, it slipped away due to pesky technical glitches.
In the pulsating second race of the playoff’s second round, Kevin Harvick, Stewart’s close friend and a driving legend, narrowly missed the top spot by a mere 0.012 seconds, with Ryan Blaney seizing the day. But the euphoria was short-lived. A post-race inspection flagged a windshield violation and loose fasteners on his vehicle, leading to his disqualification. The incident sparked whispers: Would the SHR team challenge the verdict? And now, as the team’s stance emerges, murmurs of potential foul play are resonating amongst the fans.
Stewart-Haas Racing clarifies the DQ controversy of Kevin Harvick
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
In the stringent world of NASCAR, windshield fasteners are mandated to remain steadfast throughout an event, a stipulation underlined in the NASCAR Rule Book sections 14.5.6.2.F (windshield) and 14.1.E&P (general vehicle assembly regulations).
Kevin Harvick, with a thrilling chase to the finish, fell short by a heart-stopping time difference behind Ryan Blaney. Yet the jubilation of a near-win soon fizzled out. The subsequent disqualification relegated Harvick to a 38th-place finish, assigning him a solitary point. The accolades for his commendable eighth place in the second stage, along with the associated points, also evaporated.
While a potential appeal loomed large, Greg Zipadelli, Chief Competition Officer, dashed any lingering hopes with an official statement, while brutally slamming NASCAR’s Talladega disqualification decision: “At the completion of the race, not all of our windshield fasteners were secure, as we had bolts that hold the windshield in place back out over the course of the 500 miles. We are in the process of diagnosing why this happened and how to prevent it moving forward.”
“We are disappointed in NASCAR’s decision to disqualify our racecar and the hard-earned finish by our driver and team, but we will not appeal. Our complete focus is on the remaining races on this year’s schedule.”
Statement from Greg Zipadelli, chief competition officer, regarding the penalty levied against the No. 4 team following Sunday's race at Talladega. pic.twitter.com/PYf0RocUNe
— Stewart-Haas Racing (@StewartHaasRcng) October 2, 2023
Yet, Stewart-Haas Racing’s transparency hasn’t appeased some fans. Murmurs of discontent ripple through the crowd, with whispers of underlying motives behind the team’s decision not to appeal the penalty.
Watch This Story: Denny Hamlin Blames Tony Stewart for Letting Down Slowest Kevin Harvick
NASCAR fans question SHR’s unchallenged acceptance of the penalty
Trending
Tony Stewart’s Wife Leah Pruett Pens a Heartfelt Message for Husband After His Unwavering Support for His Family
“We Are Not Morning People”- Travel Woes Hit Home for Kyle Busch & Wife Samantha Leaving Son Brexton Grinning
Dale Earnhardt Jr. Offers a Once-in-a-Lifetime Opportunity to His Loyal Fanbase as He Gears Up for His Return With Budweiser
JRM Prodigy & Kelley Earnhardt’s Son Earn Major Backing as Dale Jr.’s Loyal Partners Announce 2025 Return
Rick Hendrick’s Alliance Rumored to Save Chevy Prodigy Who Crashed Kyle Busch’s Party
The astute and ever-vigilant NASCAR fanbase rarely misses a beat, from subtle car modifications to off-track shenanigans. And now, the recent statement by Tony Stewart’s team has left the fans intrigued and speculating. The collective eyebrow raise seems to indicate a suspicion of underlying intentions behind SHR’s decision not to challenge the penalty.
As soon as the statement was released online, fans didn’t shy away from expressing their doubts, pointedly remarking, “This isn’t the first time the 4 team has done something like this either.”
“Reducing the strength of parts seems to be a specialty,” hinting at the deliberate weakening of fasteners to shed some vehicular weight.
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
Others believed that the reason for non-appealing was clear-cut. “There’s nothing to appeal lmao if the penalty is for not having fasteners, then they can’t appeal the not having fasteners. They’re either there, or they aren’t. You can’t appeal that,” a fan noted, while another chimed in with, “makes sense to not appeal a decision you won’t win.”
In the midst of the heated discourse, one fan succinctly labeled the team, “So…guilty.” Another interpreted the statement as: “We acknowledge we cheated/messed up big time, but we’re disappointed with NASCAR’s decision to enforce the rules” is essentially what this says.”
A more sarcastic take from the fanbase was, “We DoNt kNoW hOw ThIs CoUlD hApPeN!!!” as if there isn’t 30 different ways to prevent it” with the insinuation that preventative measures are well-known. A comment, “Hard-earned?” was also thrown around by one of the NASCAR fans, questioning the team’s merits.
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
Well, where do you stand on SHR’s decision? Is it a simple acceptance, or are there veiled motives preventing them from appealing the penalty? Share your thoughts below.