NASCAR’s Point System Through the Years: Exploring the Never Ending Controversy

Ask yourself this, how do you determine the best in a super-competitive sport laced with fierce drivers like NASCAR? Would you pick the most winningest driver of the season as the champion or would you consider the racer with the average finish as the best or is it the individual who can overcome adversity to win it at the big stage, say the final championship decider race? This is one question that has triggered so much controversy in the community so much so that the sanctioning body had to revise its points system across seven generations.

While the organization had to consider several variables to present an appealing product for its massive fanbase, in the process of doing so, NASCAR has sort of downplayed itself with rigorous revamping thus attracting criticism both from its fan community and its drivers alike.

Point system dilemma – How NASCAR’s point format has changed over the years

From the initial phase of the sport in 1949, NASCAR has constantly evolved its points format, making changes concerning the money earned, miles and laps run, a complicated one-year formula, the Latford system, the Chase, and the current elimination playoffs that is in effect today. Each of these systems has its own merits and demerits as drivers like Denny Hamlin and Darrell Waltrip have been vocal about NASCAR’s ineffective format of selecting the winner.

While the current system utilizes a playoff-style, elimination-rounder format that creates a sense of excitement in the community, this current layout also has its cons. It is designed in such a way that the initial phase of the tournament holds no value as drivers just need to pick off wins in the later half to propel themselves into the playoffs and further ahead by solely relying on points.

For instance, Michael McDowell who won the Indy500 did not make it to the playoff rounds because of the point deficit but 23XI Racing driver, Bubba Wallace who had zero wins cheekily secured the necessary points to make it past the regular season. The recent Kevin Harvick stats that emerged in the NASCAR nation are another example to prove our point about the flawed system. Harvick has pretty much been the uncrowned king of NASCAR for the past decade with the former SHR driver topping the charts for the most number of wins, laps led, etc yet the 2014 Cup Series champion has only one title to his name.

WATCH THIS STORY: The dark side of NASCAR’s forgotten track

Earlier during the initial days, points were based on the amount of prize money in a race. For instance, a race during that era promising prize money of $1,000 would get the first-place finisher 50 points with 5 points separating drivers in the second, and third places. This was later revised to a system that emphasized mileage where the winner would get 50 points for a race with 250 laps or less with one point separating drivers accordingly, for races above the 250 miles mark, the first-place winner would get 100 points while the point difference would be two and for races having more than 400 miles on the meter, the finisher would be getting 150 points, 3 points separating the winner and the 2nd place finisher and accordingly for each place.

However all these systems had their drawbacks as the community found out its flaws, hence a new system was introduced in 1972 which would be based on laps completed.

The infamous 1974 formula and how the current system came into effect

Trending

NASCAR Rumor: 66-YO Surprise Daytona 500 Winner Could Make a Return to NASCAR in 2025

How Late NASCAR Legend Was Forced to “Sell Everything” After Losing $10,000 to Mafia

Historic NASCAR Track Shutting Its Door After Final Run Has Racing Community Heartbroken

Forgotten NASCAR Track: North Carolina’s Abandoned Legacy Lost in the Woods

Shane Van Gisbergen Discloses a Major Problem in NASCAR After Leaving Supercars

In the year 1974, the organization decided to address the issue and bring about a change to its points system and introduced a layout based on a mathematical formula. Yes, you heard it right. Here the driver points were calculated by multiplying prize money excluding the bonuses to races started then dividing the product by 1000. This however resulted in a points system that had even decimal values and bizarre figures.

This in turn prompted Bill France Jr to rope in his close friend Bob Latford, giving way to the Boot Hill format/Latford model. This system remained in effect with minor tweaks until 2003 when the Chase format was introduced. Amidst all these revamps, the organization was getting driver backlashes as Darrell Waltrip voiced his displeasure publicly, asking, “Well, if being #1 in all categories doesn’t make you the champion or the #1 driver in the sport, then why keep score?” 

After it took the organization several years to come up with a new format, it introduced the Chase format in 2003 which is arguably the closest to the current playoff format. Here only the top 10 drivers in points were eligible for the championship. In a nutshell, the basic idea of this system was to make the closing races more engaging and entertaining, essentially to pump up the dwindling viewership and rating as the new format was ingenious considering it gave NASCAR some of the closest points battles in the history of the sport.

To make matters more interesting for fans, the organization introduced the elimination-style races and it quickly took the steam out of the initial races as drivers and teams would simply fine-tune their equipment for the later rounds and put on a blitzkrieg to win the championship just like when the iconic HMS duo of Jimmie Johnson and Chad Knaus won it back to back five times.

READ MORE: “That’s What Racing Was Built on”- Veteran Insider Reveals Torn Feelings on NASCAR Cracking Down on Ingenious Hacks

However, fans quite literally had enough of watching a single driver/team dominate the scene and thus the ratings spiralled down again prompting NASCAR to readdress the situation and come up with the current playoff format which has 16 drivers filtered into four over three rounds.

But the current system is also widely criticized for its flaws. To know more about the current situation, here is our perspective on how the current format is possibly the worst in deciding the best.