Michael McDowell Goes Against Kyle Busch As He Slams NASCAR “Lame” Change to an Iconic Track

In a stellar display on the serpentine 14-turn, 2.439-mile circuit of Indianapolis International Speedway, Michael McDowell clinched victory with aplomb. Notably, the tarmac bore witness to fewer mishaps than usual on this occasion. Despite beginning the race merely a whisker away from the elite 16-driver playoff lineup, McDowell’s performance was reminiscent of his triumphant stride in the 2021 Daytona 500. This tour de force by McDowell has, for the time being, cast a shadow on Ty Gibbs’ playoff aspirations.

In the aftermath of the race, Michael McDowell radiated euphoria, not just for his prowess, but also in homage to his squad’s exceptional synergy. Yet, when broached with the topic of NASCAR potentially reverting to the oval track, McDowell’s response was not quite in line with the anticipated script.

In contrast to Kyle Busch, clamoring for an alteration at the Indianapolis Road Course, Michael McDowell firmly anchors his stance.

Before the grand spectacle, Kyle Busch found himself in the spotlight during a press conference. When quizzed about his sentiments regarding IndyCar and NASCAR sharing the stage on a unified racetrack, Busch conceded the novelty of the joint weekend in Indianapolis. However, he waxed eloquently about the allure and legacy of the Oval. “I think many of us drivers, crews, and everything else would rather be coming here and racing around the oval with the prestige and the history of what the oval is. Even though we’re at Indy, it just doesn’t really feel like it’s the same thing going the wrong way,” he mused.

But the recent coronation of Michael McDowell as the NASCAR Cup race victor brought forth a divergent perspective. When prompted about the whispers of NASCAR shifting gears to the oval the following year, given his own triumph on the road course, McDowell’s retort was succinct: “Lame.” Delving deeper into his rationale, he expressed an ardor for the road courses but simultaneously acknowledged the venerable stature of the oval track.

“I want to run on as many road courses as we can,” he said, “but I do understand the prestigiousness of running the Brickyard and being on the oval, and I do think that this Next-Gen car is going to put on a good race. It’s going to put on a better race than our previous generation car here.”

Building on this, he proposed a harmonious blend: “I understand wanting to go back to the oval. All I’m asking is, Can we do both? Can we run the oval and the road course? Is that a possibility?”

McDowell’s recent triumph on the sinuous path seems to have emboldened his conviction. Yet, it raises the question: does he stand as a lone voice extolling the virtues of road courses over the oval?

Watch This Story: Another Setback for Rick Hendrick As Star Driver Fails To Qualify

The Oval vs. Road Course debate at Indianapolis International Speedway

Trending

Brad Keselowski’s Trump Card Move Could Be a Career-Altering Transfer for Tony Stewart’s Underwhelming Driver

Michael Jordan’s Opponent’s Warning Comes True as Roger Penske Shuts Down NASCAR’s Infiltration

Billionaire Michael Jordan Could Be Forced to Face Substantial Personal Loss in Bid to Topple NASCAR, Warns Insider

Tony Stewart & Co’s Desperate Bargain Offer to $19.2 Billion Partner Amid NASCAR Exit Leaves Fans Baffled

Ex-SHR Employee Spills Harsh Truth About Tony Stewart’s NASCAR Ownership After Rare Appearance in Phoenix

Amidst the brewing maelstrom concerning NASCAR’s potential transition from a road course to an oval at the illustrious Indianapolis International Speedway, several luminaries have voiced their sentiments.

While Kyle Busch’s penchant for the oval is evident and Michael McDowell’s inclination veers towards the road course, the larger ensemble of drivers paints a mosaic of mixed perspectives on the matter.

As per sports.yahoo.com, Kyle Larson opined, “I think there’s no denying that the oval is going to be a much more boring race, probably. I think just the prestige of the oval—we would all rather win on the oval than the road course, I think. When you think of the Indianapolis Motor Speedway, you don’t think of the road course, so the Brickyard 400 is a crown jewel event that we lost. So if we can get it back on the oval, it would be great for our sport.”

Echoing a similar sentiment, Chase Briscoe emphasized the emblematic significance of the track, remarking, “It’s a crown jewel. There’s no other way to say it. It’s the Daytona 500 and then the Brickyard 400 in terms of, from a driver’s standpoint, what every driver wants to win. I grew up coming to Brickyard 400s, so coming back would be super special, and I’m just excited to see what this test holds.”

Tyler Reddick, while reflecting on the transition, postulated, “I think it’s just seeing how the test goes. A lot of folks at NASCAR, honestly, and I enjoy being on the oval, but they need it to be a good race; we need to be able to race each other… If we really can’t race each other well and pass, I don’t know if we really should run the oval. We’ll see shortly, but if it works out, we could certainly run both.”

A recent report by IndyStar alludes to Roger Penske, the custodian of IMS, speculating a NASCAR resurgence on the track by 2024. However, the fulcrum of the decision seemingly pivots on the tire test. It’s worth noting that the IMS oval, in yesteryears, was infamous for the tribulations it posed to NASCAR’s previous stock cars, with high velocities precipitating tire mishaps, thereby necessitating caution intervals. However, some drivers anticipate that the contemporary Next Gen vehicles, coupled with the revamped Goodyear tires, will enhance the racing experience on the oval.

Read More: HMS Icon Confesses His Weakest Trait Despite Uncommon Indy Outing