Over the years, NASCAR has constantly been revamping its structure, including numerous rule changes. One such rule that NASCAR actively changed over the years was the removal of contingency sponsors. Contingency sponsors once used to be essential for racing teams, but over time, the emphasis was shifted to primary sponsors. The stickers that occupied the front sides of the car were absent and it was clear that the concept of contingency sponsors was coming to an end. This change led to widespread criticism among fans who felt that getting rid of these stickers robbed the cars of their sporty look. In light of this rule change, JGR president David Alpern provided some much-needed insight into the move.
Revealing the real reason behind this decision, Joe Gibbs‘ president David Alpern said, “They were the partners who supplied parts and pieces to NASCAR and the teams, and they were the little bumper stickers looking decals that were on the front portion of the cars. So the teams decided to pull that space back to provide more value to our primary sponsors”. He further added, “It cleans up the look of the car and provides more for the sponsors who are paying for the majority of the car to do with what they want”.
View this post on Instagram
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
Primary sponsors hold a very important role in NASCAR because they are liable for most financial transactions. Without solid primary sponsors, most teams would succumb to the financial burdens of maintaining vehicles and paying salaries. Usually, racing teams depend on primary sponsors to function and hence deserve the most visibility. It does make sense that the brand paying the highest amount gets the most real estate on the car. However, getting away with the contingency sponsors could be detrimental to some racers, like when Kasey Kagne ended up earning about $200,000 from contingency rewards alone in 2005.
While the shift to prioritizing primary sponsors ensures financial stability and streamlined aesthetics for NASCAR teams, it also signifies a departure from the tradition that once celebrated smaller contributors. Balancing innovation with heritage remains a challenge for NASCAR as it continues to evolve its sponsorship strategies.
NASCAR fans take a jibe at JGR president’s reasoning about contingency rewards
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
NASCAR fans were quick to challenge JGR president Dave Alpern’s justification for contingency rewards, sparking a lively debate about the fairness and impact of the removal of incentives from the sport. There are no doubts that the existence of the contingency stickers contributed to a funkier look because, after all, this was a major USP that worked in favor of the cars. Pointing out the same, a fan commented, “Bring them back! Stock cars look 100% better with a wall of contingencies around the front wheel”.
Contingency sponsors usually gave viewers an idea about what brands were behind their favorite teams. Keeping the same sentiment alive, a fan commented, “Bring back the shopping list”. On the flip side, there are opinions that the move might not be a decision from NASCAR’s side alone. Some fans believe that with that contingency sponsors also chose to exit together. “Subsidiary or larger companies that may or may not compete with contingency sponsors. Also the contingency sponsors left NASCAR.”, wrote one fan.
The influence of primary sponsors in the realm of NASCAR cannot be discounted as the sport might collapse without them. However, one fan seemed ready to trade in primary sponsors, given how the cars looked ‘more authentic’ with contingency decals. “We would rather have those sponsors than primary sponsors btw, makes the cars look more race carish.”, wrote one user.
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
However, not all fans are aligned about their stances on the removal of contingency sponsors. Some argue that modern designs benefit from fewer sponsors, making cars look sleeker., with one fan commenting, “Call me crazy but I think contingency sponsors make the car look more crowded”. While some fans yearn for the days of sticker-covered cars, others appreciate the more streamlined look of today’s stock cars.
What do you think of NASCAR’s decision to do away with contingency decals? Do you miss the old look or is the modern streamlined look more up your fancy? Do let us know in the comments down below.
Have something to say?
Let the world know your perspective.
Debate
Did NASCAR's decision to ditch contingency stickers strip away the sport's authentic, gritty charm?
What’s your perspective on:
Did NASCAR's decision to ditch contingency stickers strip away the sport's authentic, gritty charm?
Have an interesting take?