Home/NASCAR
feature-image

via Imago

feature-image

via Imago

Denny Hamlin was true to his word. Last week, a fan had taken to social media to question why teams rejected the ‘Run What Ya Brung‘ concept for the All-Star race. Promising to address the underlying reasons on the Actions Detrimental podcast, the veteran racer had written on X, “It is true. I’ll talk about it Monday, and why the decision was made.” Outspoken as ever, the 44-year-old explained in detail why he and his fellow team owners rejected the proposal, and it all came down to just one thing: money.

Is he indicating that a lawless, ‘Run What Ya Brung’ format isn’t financially feasible, even for teams as big as 23XI Racing and Joe Gibbs Racing? That certainly appears to be the case, even though $1 million is up for grabs for the All-Star Race winner at North Wilkesboro next month.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

Denny Hamlin wishes he could go along with the ‘wild’ format

NASCAR has always been defined by fine margins, where the smallest advantage can make all the difference in winning and losing. With the stock car racing series depending on a single source supplier, gaining an advantage on the Next-Gen car depends on drivers’ skills, fuel strategy, pit efficiency, as well as the way the cars are tuned. However, all rules would go out the window in a ‘do whatever you want’ All-Star race, which means teams will leave no stone unturned to modify their vehicles in ways that may be deemed ‘illegal’ in any other circumstances.

However, Denny Hamlin feels that despite the concept being exciting theoretically, it’s not practical for NASCAR teams. Sharing his thoughts on the Actions Detrimental podcast, the 23XI Racing co-owner said, “I couldn’t imagine what this would cost us. More than likely, 2 million dollars? It just doesn’t make sense, guys. Trust me, as a fan and a driver, I wish we could do it. But under the parameters that were set, it just wasn’t thought out enough. It’s not feasible. No team is going to sign up to voluntarily lose millions of dollars.”

This might be one of those rare situations where both the ‘smaller’ and ‘bigger’ teams might be on the same page regarding the financial feasibility of the ‘Run what you brung’ concept. Teams like Hendrick Motorsports and Joe Gibbs Racing have four drivers each, which means modifying four cars would amount to millions of dollars. It’s a problem area Denny Hamlin identified as well, saying, “Just in parts and pieces, to replace all this s— that we’re gonna modify, we’re gonna spend a s— ton of money.” And the payoff? Just $1 million. “Even if one of my cars won, I don’t see it as a remotely break-even proposition,” Hamlin said. Even if they were to go through with it, the disparity between the bigger teams and the smaller teams is too much for them to even consider this proposition, according to Hamlin.

article-image

via Getty

Denny added, “I don’t have the CNC machines and all this stuff that the Gibbs, Hendrick, and Penske teams have. There’s only really three teams that have all the resources to go manufacture or modify parts, so we’d [23XI Racing] have to go to ‘Big Brother’.” Hamlin is speaking from the perspective of an owner of 23XI Racing, and he has a valid point. ‘Satellite’ teams like Wood Brothers Racing to Team Penske, 23XI to JGR or Spire Motorsports to Hendrick Motorsports would all have to request the big guns for financial support. Not only does that de-incentivize the bigger teams, but it also puts more pressure on the smaller ones, as they are using borrowed money.

However, Hamlin is open to a more limited and targeted open rules race, especially if NASCAR allowed teams to modify ride heights and body placement without modifying single-source parts. Giving a more practical suggestion, Hamlin said, “So maybe we say, ‘Hey, you can run whatever spoiler, whatever, you can run the car at whatever ride height you want. So if you want to put the back end a foot up in the air, go right ahead.” Ultimately, teams are all in for shaking up the All-Star format, especially if the cars look and run differently to make it exciting for fans. But it should be financially sustainable for such a concept to be entertained seriously.

What’s your perspective on:

Is NASCAR's 'run what you brung' idea a thrilling concept or a financial disaster waiting to happen?

Have an interesting take?

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

Hamlin throws shade at NASCAR’s officiating

We all know Denny Hamlin isn’t one to mince his words. The veteran racer has always been outspoken about his views on all things NASCAR, and with the All-Star race on the horizon, the sanctioning body has recently revealed new rules for the non-points-paying race, which will not only be longer but also have the option for a ‘promoter’s caution’.

For those who don’t know, that’s a caution promoters can throw at any point in the All-Star race before Lap 220, unless a caution occurs on its own after Lap 200. NASCAR’s executive vice president, John Probst, even described it as a way of “pushing the envelope with fresh competitive elements.” However, Hamlin couldn’t help but make a tongue-in-cheek comment when FOX’s Bob Pockrass asked him, “What do you think of Marcus Smith being able to throw a caution during the second half of the All-Star Race?”

Taking a dig at NASCAR’s current officiating standards and their tendency to throw cautions without reason, Denny Hamlin laughed and replied, “I don’t know how it’s much different from what we already have, truthfully.” He’s not the only one thinking along these lines, with Chase Elliott also saying, “I think that there’s been some questionable cautions thrown in the course of the history of the sport in general. So I’d just as soon know that that’s coming and that’s the plan beforehand.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

It’s clear that the 23XI Racing co-owner isn’t exactly in NASCAR’s good books, but he probably doesn’t care either. Do you agree with Hamlin and Elliott’s views? Let us know your thoughts in the comments!

ADVERTISEMENT

0
  Debate

Is NASCAR's 'run what you brung' idea a thrilling concept or a financial disaster waiting to happen?

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT