Home/NASCAR

via Imago

via Imago

0
  Debate

Debate

Is NASCAR losing credibility with drivers like Denny Hamlin calling out their questionable decisions?

The Brickyard 400, after its three-year hiatus, deserved better. For a race that had all the drama, it ended with a whimper and not a bang. While Kyle Larson secured his fourth win of the season at the iconic Indianapolis Motor Speedway, it was under very controversial circumstances and was anticlimactic, to say the least. Having overtaken Ryan Blaney on the final restart, Larson was already on his final lap when Ryan Preece spun off Turn 2 and hit the inside wall, prompting a caution after a 30-second delay.

And though we have heard many takes on the matter, Denny Hamlin’s was much awaited. After all, he is the “never-to-mince-words” rival of the crown jewel winner, Kyle Larson. Reflecting on the decision to delay caution after Ryan Preece’s incident, Denny Hamlin thus highlighted NASCAR’s inconsistencies on his Actions Detrimental podcast.

Denny Hamlin rejects NASCAR’s explanation

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

Poll of the day

Kyle Larson & HMS Are Planning to Return to Indy 500 Next Year. But Should They?

Yes! It Is Great for NASCAR

No, It Was a Disaster This Time

What have we learned from the decisions made by NASCAR at the Brickyard 400? It’s that NASCAR can continue to be very inconsistent, despite the numerous objections raised previously. In a caution-plagued race, NASCAR delayed issuing a caution after Ryan Preece’s crash, even though it was abundantly clear that the Stewart-Haas Racing driver was stuck. Had they issued the caution on time, the race would have had another restart. So, why didn’t they? Were they waiting for Kyle Larson to begin his final lap before issuing the caution, effectively crowning the Hendrick Motorsports driver the winner?

Well, speaking on his podcast Actions Detrimental, Denny Hamlin too effectively called out NASCAR’s lies. He countered Elton Sawyer’s claim, “Well, by the time we saw the 41 was not able to move, we had already crossed the start-finish line,” with a blunt, “Wrong! That’s not true.” He further said, “He (Ryan Preece) was not moving when they were coming off Turn 4. He had resigned to sitting there. You watched him in the middle of 3 and 4, he’s spinning his wheels, not going anywhere, and then through turns 4 he stops. He just says, ‘Alright, I’m not going to go anywhere’.”

“So they had roughly eight seconds to make a call there, and they did. Austin Cindric spun through the infield at Nashville, gathered up, kept going, and that was instantly a caution. This is what we’re talking about. NASCAR, this is your inconsistencies that people gripe about. They have a right to gripe because it is just so inconsistent. You can’t decide whether you want the caution or don’t want the caution. That’s the agitating part.”

USA Today via Reuters

As for the aforementioned Elton Sawyer, the Senior VP of Competition, he didn’t there were any inconsistencies in NASCAR’s ruling. In a post-race conversation, he defended the decision, saying, “Obviously we’d like for it to play out naturally. We want our teams to race to the checkered flag. We did everything we possibly could. We kept an eye on the #41. He got turned around. He was really giving a solid effort and once he came to a stop and we could tell that he had, I think, a flat left-rear tire he wasn’t going to move. We’d already taken the white, we just couldn’t run by there again. So it was unfortunate, but it was the right call.” 

What’s your perspective on:

Is NASCAR losing credibility with drivers like Denny Hamlin calling out their questionable decisions?

Have an interesting take?

Adding how such instances are handled on a case-to-case basis, the executive further claimed, “I think when it comes to safety and we have cars that have spun out and they’re trying to make an effort to move, we’re going to do everything we can to stay green,”

The Brickyard 400 was extended by seven laps, which meant the race went past its scheduled 160-lap distance because of two late cautions. Denny Hamlin mentioned that NASCAR has been “inconsistent” in this regard, as both the cautions were called promptly. The first caution came when Kyle Busch crashed while competing with Denny Hamlin for a top-five finish with less than three scheduled laps to go. The second caution came after the restart because of an incident that took out five cars, including Denny Hamlin’s.

NASCAR’s decision to delay the caution for Ryan Preece’s incident meant Tyler Reddick didn’t have the opportunity to win the race. Having already won a race this season, Reddick could have doubled his tally with a dramatic finish at IMS, but the race stayed green. As for Denny Hamlin, the Joe Gibbs Racing driver suffered his third DNF of the season and was forced to finish 32nd on a track he was desperately hoping to win.

However, the veteran had some tough words for NASCAR as he further discussed another issue plaguing the Next Gen era.

Hamlin reflects on NASCAR’s fuel mileage dilemma

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

Trending

Kyle Busch’s Wife Samantha Surprisingly Embracing Indian Culture Has Fans Going Gaga Over Fashionista Status

NASCAR Rumor: Courtesy of a $38.76B Sponsor, Tony Stewart’s Dark Horse Secures a Seat With Brad Keselowski at RFK Racing

Dale Earnhardt Jr. Enraged at Bubba Wallace After He Shot Himself in the Foot, Leaving Michael Jordan in Agony

NASCAR Fans Urge Kyle Busch for a U-Turn Amid Rumors of Rick Hendrick’s Underachiever’s Exit

Despite Alex Bowman’s Confidence, $12.67 Billion Sponsor Could Leave Him Hanging Out of HMS if the Tides Don’t Turn

Why was fuel mileage a major talking point heading into the Brickyard 400? With NASCAR returning to Indianapolis Motor Speedway after a three-year break, those who had previously raced at the iconic oval remembered that fuel conservation plays a major role in securing victory on the track. The track has traditionally been a marathon rather than a sprint, and that’s exactly where things went wrong for Brad Keselowski. Unlike Kyle Larson, who employed a safe fuel strategy, Keselowski was running on fumes in the closing stages of the race. Predictably, the RFK Racing driver ran out of gas when Kyle Busch’s wreck brought out a caution.

With drivers expected to race for seven extra laps, multiple cautions meant drivers had the opportunity to coast during the multiple disruptions that occurred during the race. With fuel efficiency being a priority, drivers even raced slower than usual. Why? By doing so, they prioritized distance over speed, hoping to outlast opponents instead of outracing them. For a track that isn’t known for side-by-side racing and overtaking opportunities, it’s easy to understand why teams employed this race strategy.

Expressing his frustration at how the race played out, Denny Hamlin said, “We just had caution after caution after caution. This is what we have created. We have created a car that’s about fuel mileage now on these big tracks, that run half throttle. This is the kind of stuff you’re going to see. You’re going to see people push fuel mileage, run half-throttle, not be able to pass, and this is the outcome.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

The absence of ‘all-out’ racing could end up costing NASCAR in the long run. Fans want their beloved sport to remain entertaining instead of the strategic direction it is heading towards. This means that the fastest racer should win, not the one that has conserved fuel most effectively. If NASCAR wants to remain a sport that grows in popularity in the future, it needs to prioritize what fans want.

What are your thoughts about Brickyard 400’s anticlimactic finish? Let us know in the comments!