Home/NASCAR
feature-image
feature-image

cWhat happens when the most significant story from a race weekend isn’t who dominated, but how little of the race fans got to see Darlington was intended to be a throwback celebration—a homage to NASCAR’s grit, its history, and the rough racing that built its name. According to reports, the track’s action did just that. Tension was caused by tire wear. Drivers fought for every available inch. Deep within the field, battles erupted. Fans at home, meanwhile, were left wondering where the drama was and whether it materialized.

But it seemed like the race was missing something. Even The King, Richard Petty, thought so. “It was good for the #11 car, okay? As far as just pure racing (is concerned), it’s hard to say. Okay, because there was a lot of racing going on in the back of the field, not at the front. So if you were judging it, you would say it really was not a really good race,”  he explained.

Tire falloff, numerous grooves, and mid-pack fights that required constant attention were all part of the gritty, strategy-heavy display of typical Darlington drama that took place on the course. However, none of that was shown to people who watched on TV. Rather, even as pandemonium simmered throughout the field, the FOX broadcast barely shifted its focus from William Byron’s commanding lead. It was a race that unfolded one way in real life and another way on screen, and for many, that discrepancy has been the last straw.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

As more fans voice their opinions and even voices inside the booth start pointing fingers, it’s becoming clear that this wasn’t just another Sunday. Darlington may have revealed NASCAR’s most obvious modern-day shortcoming, and now the focus is on the people displaying it rather than the track. This is because the issue wasn’t the racing, but rather something deeper, and it’s gotten more obvious every week.

article-image

via Imago

Richard Petty, who was in the FOX booth last Sunday alongside his son Kyle, didn’t mince his words about the situation. “The big deal is when I’m sitting here and see what I see on TV and the race is really back about 15th or 20th. Them guys — they drive their fanny off every lap. I mean, they’re really racing back there, but you know, if you’re here you can see that. You can’t see it on TV.” 

NASCAR royalty provided the moment that ignited the match. “There’s good racing throughout the field that we should look at,” remarked Richard Petty. Mike Joy’s response, “You’re right, but we can’t show it all. So you should come to the track instead,” stated more than it meant to. That moment sounded tone-deaf rather than flat. Fans did not hear a defense of live racing. They learned that FOX was aware of the racing, but decided not to broadcast it.

The Disconnect That Darlington Couldn’t Hide

That moment confirmed what many fans were already expressing: the problem isn’t the racing—it’s the way FOX tells the story. As one fan put it, “I feel like these polls are more a reflection of the broadcast than the race itself. People who were in attendance have been pretty vocal the past few days about how good the racing was. That includes here as well as what I’ve heard on SXM. Certainly Byron leading for as long as he did meant FOX showing him and him alone—made it seem like nothing was going on.” 

What’s your perspective on:

Did FOX's broadcast ruin what could've been the best race of the season at Darlington?

Have an interesting take?

However, a lot was happening. Simply put, the TV viewers missed it. In an intense battle in Stage 2, Bubba Wallace, Ryan Blaney, and Ross Chastain ran three-wide, an ambitious move at a phase of the race where positions usually level off. The broadcast did not feature that battle. Just a few feet from the wall, Tyler Reddick and Kyle Larson fought a tense high-line clash in the last stage. Even that was not acknowledged. Additionally, Joey Logano’s late-race surge on new tires in the final circuits, which sliced through the field and threatened the top ten, was completely off-camera. The home viewers were left with a continuous loop of Byron’s uncontested lead and the sporadic close-ups of the vintage paint job.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

This isn’t a one-off problem. Fans watching the race in person had a dramatically better experience. One shared, “Seeing a race in person is always the better option, but we can’t go to all the races. Out of the many tracks I’ve been fortunate enough to see in person, a few stand out as having a MUCH better viewing experience at the track. Darlington is one of them, along with Bristol, Dover, and Fontana (RIP). Attending those tracks in person and being able to control what I see and tune my scanner to those drivers makes those races so much better than relying on TV.”

That is the true problem. Fans believe that the race they are viewing isn’t truly figurative of what is happening because of FOX’s camera choices, commentary tempo, and lack of mid-pack attention. The story is still trapped up top, even when drivers are cutting through the field and pit tactics are being developed. Additionally, the broadcast booth isn’t helping.

Although Mike Joy is still revered for his many years of service, supporters have started to express worry that his answers are becoming more contemptuous than perceptive. What many are currently feeling was expressed by one viewer: “Race was ok, FOX presentation was not. Mike Joyless, Boyer, and that atrocious race director need to go.” Once considered a great addition, Clint Bowyer’s intensity now frequently detracts from important racing details. Additionally, the most frequently criticized feature of NASCAR’s TV product is the race direction—the actual choices on what to show, when to cut away, and what to replay.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

That’s why Richard Petty‘s straightforward remark touched so many people. The racing caught his attention. It was acknowledged by the FOX crew. However, nothing altered. “I get Mike’s sentiment, but also—just show us the exciting battles,” a fan stated. That is the request. Not the best movie ever made. Not celebrity cameos or multi-box graphics. Simply display the race, particularly when it’s good. It was at Darlington. FOX didn’t catch it either. The outcome isn’t what fans are upset over. They are irritated because, despite the existence of the product, the network that is meant to make it a reality continues to view it incorrectly. One of the finest races this season might have been Darlington. You wouldn’t realize it, though, if all you saw was what FOX showed. And the issue is that.

ADVERTISEMENT

0
  Debate

Did FOX's broadcast ruin what could've been the best race of the season at Darlington?

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT