

When Richard Petty challenged NASCAR’s authority in 1969 over engine restrictions, he was merely opening a chapter in stock car racing’s long history of power struggles. Today, another titan—basketball legend Michael Jordan—finds himself in a similar position, but the stakes are exponentially higher. NASCAR has escalated its legal battle against Michael Jordan’s 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports with explosive new accusations, calling out Michael Jordan’s longtime business manager Curtis Polk as the orchestrator of an “illegal conspiracy” designed to “threaten, coerce, and extort” the sport.
The dispute centers around NASCAR’s charter system—the sport’s equivalent of a franchise model that guarantees teams race entries and revenue shares. What began as a refusal by 23XI and Front Row to sign 2025 charter agreements has evolved into a high-stakes antitrust showdown that could fundamentally reshape America’s premier stock car racing series.
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
NASCAR Fires Back: Curtis Polk at Center of ‘Illegal Conspiracy’ Claims
NASCAR’s 30-page counterclaim filed in March takes direct aim at the two holdout teams, with particularly pointed language reserved for Polk. The stock car governing body alleges that “the undisputed reality is that it is 23XI and FRM, led by 23XI’s owner and sports agent Curtis Polk, that willfully violated the antitrust laws by orchestrating anticompetitive collective conduct in connection with the terms of the 2025 Charter Agreements.”
The battle has intensified further, according to veteran NASCAR reporter Bob Pockrass, who revealed on Twitter: “In the 23XI/FRM lawsuit, NASCAR is asking the court to be allowed to amend its counterclaim with evidence that came from more than 200,000 pages of emails, texts, and memoranda recently obtained through discovery.” This suggests NASCAR believes it has uncovered additional evidence supporting its claims during the legal discovery process.
NASCAR attorney Christopher Yates went so far as to tell The Associated Press that Polk “doesn’t understand the sport,” claiming he “orchestrated and threatened a boycott” of qualifying races and engaged in behavior that might work in the NBA but is “not appropriate in NASCAR.” The counterclaim alleges Polk attempted to organize boycotts of events, engaged in negative media campaigns, and even tried to interfere with NASCAR’s multibillion-dollar media rights negotiations.
Team attorney Jeffrey Kessler fired back, calling NASCAR’s counterclaim “a meritless distraction and a desperate attempt to shift attention away from its own unlawful, monopolistic actions.” The conflict has now reached a critical juncture, with NASCAR threatening to dismantle the entire charter system—a move that would send shockwaves through the sport’s economic foundation.
In the 23XI/FRM lawsuit, NASCAR is asking the court to be allowed to amend its counterclaim with evidence that came from more than 200,000 pages of emails, texts, and memoranda recently obtained through discovery. (1/2)
— Bob Pockrass (@bobpockrass) April 17, 2025
What’s your perspective on:
Is NASCAR's monopoly finally being challenged, or are 23XI and Front Row overstepping their bounds?
Have an interesting take?
In a strategic maneuver that could dramatically impact the case, 23XI and Front Row recently filed a motion seeking to compel Formula 1 owner Liberty Media to comply with a subpoena that would help calculate damages using the “yardstick method.” According to reports, the NASCAR teams want to compare F1’s revenue-sharing structure with NASCAR’s, requesting documents showing F1’s revenue streams, team payment formulas, and even the confidential Concorde Agreement that governs F1 team participation.
They have tried multiple times to introduce outside perspectives on the matter. The NASCAR teams investigated revenue distribution methods and franchise network organization of the NFL, NBA, and NHL through court-filed subpoenas at the US District Court based in New York.
The upcoming trial date for December 1 has not halted 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports from participating in the 2025 season through their preliminary court win. This legal battle shows great promise to become one of the most influential cases in the entire American motorsport due to the flying accusations and the critical condition of NASCAR’s core business framework.
Trending
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
“Jordan’s $70 Million Aircraft: Business Necessity or Legal Leverage?”
While the legal battle intensifies between NASCAR and Michael Jordan’s racing operation, the basketball legend’s recent $70 million purchase of a Gulfstream G650ER has raised eyebrows across the motorsports community. Former NASCAR driver Kenny Wallace defended the acquisition as “a necessary evil” in a sport that runs 39 races annually, arguing that commercial travel simply “doesn’t work that way” for racing teams traversing the country weekly. The custom-painted aircraft, reportedly costing over $500,000 for its distinctive livery, serves as both a practical tool and a powerful symbol of Michael Jordan’s commitment to his racing venture despite the ongoing litigation.
The purchase comes at a particularly interesting time, as NASCAR’s counterclaim has labeled Jordan’s team part of an “illegal cartel” – language that team attorney Jeffrey Kessler dismissed to The Athletic as “a meritless distraction and a desperate attempt to shift attention away from [NASCAR’s] own unlawful, monopolistic actions.” At the heart of the dispute is revenue distribution from NASCAR’s new $7.7 billion media rights deal, where the current breakdown allocates approximately 65% to tracks, 25% to teams, and 10% to NASCAR itself. However, Jordan’s team has highlighted that since NASCAR owns about half of the Cup Series tracks, the sanctioning body effectively receives closer to 42.5% of TV money – a fact the basketball icon cited when calling the France family and NASCAR “monopolistic bullies.”
The thirteen NASCAR organisations agreed to the latest charter agreement under pressure from within the industry, while Michael Jordan maintains his position through this decision to show his dedication to changing NASCAR’s financial system. The Jordan Motorsports aircraft demonstrates both its functional value and expresses the depth of financial capability that the organisation has in this intense power struggle. The ongoing legal battle for American stock car racing will continue despite the December trial, according to 23XI Racing budgetary investments, because the team is ready to fight for a significant financial game-changer.
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Is NASCAR's monopoly finally being challenged, or are 23XI and Front Row overstepping their bounds?