The Case Against Bruce Meyer: What MLBPA Players Have Against Union’s Second-in-Command

A storm is about to strike the Major League Baseball Players Association (MLBPA). The 2024 season has just begun and in a matter of weeks, there has been a flood of requests from players calling for the removal of Deputy Executive Director Bruce Meyer. 

As this unexpected development takes a new turn, questions about Meyer’s leadership rise. Has he not been handling key issues well? Is he jeopardizing the future direction of the MLBPA? Before one gets to answer those questions, it is important to know who Bruce Meyer is. 

Who is Bruce Meyer: Know him in detail

Bruce Meyer is a tenured attorney with more than 30 years of experience in sports law. Starting his career at Weil, Gotshal & Manges, honing his skills in litigation and labor law, he particularly shifted his focus on sports-related issues.  In the year 1985, he participated in a case about the Baltimore Orioles and television rights. And that was one of his initial stages of early involvement in the world of baseball. 

Meyer moved on from private practice to the NHL Players’ Association (NHLPA) in the year 2016. There he served as Senior Director of Collective Bargaining, Policy, and Legal Affairs.  His tenure with the NHLPA was synchronous with the era of relative stability in labor relations. And there were no major lockouts or strikes in his two-year stint. But things were not so still later on.

In 2018, Meyer became a part of the MLBPA as the Senior Director of Collective Bargaining and Legal matters. Then in 2022, July, he was promoted to Deputy Executive Director becoming the number two man under Executive Director Tony Clark. With great power came great responsibility. This promotion placed him in a pivotal position, influencing the negotiation of player contracts, grievance procedures, and other crucial issues critical to MLB players. Quite a big deal you see. Perhaps it is this link that was the root of the stir. 

His contribution to the MLB: Into Bruce Meyer’s work for unionizing minor leagues

One of Meyer’s most prominent services to the MLBPA came with this engagement in unionizing minor league players. For years, the minor leaguers lacked formal representation and were subject to meager wages. What was further torturous were long hours, and limited benefits to add on. In 2021, with Meyer playing a key role, the MLBPA was able to negotiate the first-ever collective bargaining agreement (CBA) for minor leaguers and that was a cause for celebration.  This historic agreement established minimum salaries, better working conditions, and much-needed protection for minor league players.

Read More: Why Is MLBPA Backing Harry Marino? Everything You Need to Know about the Former MLB Player

Meyer’s work drew applause on the minor league CBA. However some observers also noted potential conflicts of interest.  While his negotiations with Major League Baseball (MLB) went on, Meyer had earlier joined hands with powerful agent Scott Boras. Remember, the’s the man who represents numerous minor leaguers as well. On one hand, there’s no evidence of any sort of wrongdoing. On the other, this association raised more than a few eyebrows about whether Meyer’s approach truly prioritized the long-term interests of all minor leaguers or not. Perhaps there was an element of personal benefit. And that puts the spotlight on an important question. 

Why is Bruce Meyer facing the unrest? Is Scott Boras the reason?

Despite his role in securing the minor league CBA, Meyer finds himself in a tough spot. A growing wave of discontent among MLB players. Several key factors come to the forefront. But one person seems to be at the core of it all. 

1. Dissatisfaction with Free Agency Market –  Multiple players are unhappy with the current situation of the free agency market. Several prominent free agents, like shortstop Carlos Correa, have grappled with finding a lucrative long-term deal. MLB players believe the MLBPA should be contributing more toward addressing this issue. Especially the reluctance of teams to offer large contracts to players with a far higher work experience. Further, some critics suggest that Meyer’s background in representing teams during his time at Weil, Gotshal & Manges could influence his way of handing free agency negotiations. Particularly when it comes to prioritizing ownership interests over player concerns. 

1. Leadership Style: Another factor that comes into play here is his leadership style. He comes off as a rigid and lawerly manner lacking the empathy and player-centric qualities that players require. Perhaps it is his rigid and lawyerly instincts that push him to prioritize technicalities over practicalities.
2. Scott Boras Connection: One of the primary reasons that comes as a potential culprit in this situation is the Boras Connection. Meyer’s connection to Scott Boras continues to fuel player discontent. First, there’s no evidence of impropriety. Second, some players believe that his association with Boras creates a conflict of interest. Could it be that considering negotiations concerning Boras’ clientele, there’s an impact bigger than one can see? 

While these issues have sprung up in a situation where a chunk of players, reportedly including representatives from both major and minor leagues, are calling for Meyer’s removal at the earliest. They are vouching for the appointment of Harry Marino as a replacement- a former MLBPA lawyer who was key in organizing minor league players.

What can be the next course? Will Harry Marino replace him in the MLBPA?

The MLBPA leadership, consisting of Executive Director Tony Clark, could be involved in open and transparent dialogue with players. This discussion could involve town hall meetings or surveys. To take it a step further, it could also mean the creation of a task force to address player grievances. Clarity in understanding the player’s sentiment is important for crafting solutions. 

The MLBPA also needs to grow a detailed strategy to address the challenges impacting the free agency market. Further, this involves exploring rule changes that do not encourage teams from manipulating service time to delay arbitration and free agency eligibility. 

The MLBPA’s executive committee could also conduct a thorough evaluation of Meyer’s leadership. This evaluation will likely consider player feedback, Meyer’s performance in key negotiations, and his competitive effectiveness in representing the interests of MLB players.  Keeping this as evidence, the MLBPA can figure out if changes to the leadership structure are needed.

Considering all these Harry Marino’s potential role would be key. Harry Marino, the former MLBPA lawyer championed by some players, is experienced in both labor relations and advocating for minor leaguers. But his considerable lack of experience at the highest levels of MLB contract discussions compared to his potential predecessor would be something to look at closely. 

Read More: MLB to Cough Up Monstrous $185 Million Landmark Settlement Following Violations Born From 2014 Federal Case

A key factor at play here is if Meyer remains in his position, the MLBPA could navigate more ways to leverage Marino’s expertise within the organization. It is possible that this would leave Marino in a more prominent role in future negotiations or player advocacy initiatives.

Ultimately, the decision of whether to retain Bruce Meyer or pursue a change in leadership rests with the MLBPA’s executive committee. Whatever decision this situation yields, will leave a significant impact on the future direction of the union How will its ability to effectively represent the interests of its members be affected?