At the recent Amazin’ Day fan fest at Citi Field, Mets owner Steve Cohen didn’t hold back when discussing the ongoing contract drama with star first baseman Pete Alonso. The usually tight-lipped owner offered candid insights that pulled the curtain on the high-stakes negotiations. Cohen confirmed that the Mets had already made a “substantial” offer to Alonso, acknowledging that the slugger has every right to test the waters of his market value.  

But—and here’s the kicker—Cohen didn’t mince words about his frustration with what he sees as less-than-ideal terms coming back from Alonso’s camp. Cohen let fans know that these negotiations have been anything but smooth sailing. He even went as far as to compare it to other tough negotiations, saying, “Soto was tough—but this is worse.” Is Scott Boras the cause for all this ruckus? One sports writer definitely thinks so.

Scott Boras’ desire to get his client the most might be getting in the way 

James Nolan’s take on Pete Alonso’s situation adds an interesting twist. Nolan wrote on X, “Pete Alonso should fire Scott Boras. Clear as day he wants to be with the #Mets. The Mets front office wants him back, but doesn’t want to give in to Boras’ demands.” Do you think Nolan is right?  The idea that Alonso should fire his agent, Scott Boras, implies a belief that the player’s heart is with the Mets, but the agent’s demands are getting in the way. On the one side, Nolan’s perspective might make sense because Alonso has represented the team for many years, and it’s obvious that he and the Mets wish to maintain their partnership.  

However, Boras isn’t just any agent; he’s one of the most influential people in sports, and his role is to maximize his client’s worth, even if it means negotiating difficult terms. Although Alonso does want to remain in New York, Boras may be searching for a better offer than a “hometown discount.” To be honest, Boras is unlikely to let his client accept a contract that he believes leaves money on the table. So, it’s difficult to argue that Boras is “getting in the way” of Alonso’s personal desire to stay back, even though it’s conceivable that he does.   

Pete Alonso’s agent defends his stance  

The renowned Scott Boras quickly responded to Steve Cohen‘s worries by defending Pete’s contract demands in a statement to The Athletic. Boras claimed that the terms were reasonable and in keeping with what elite players usually want in discussions, framing Alonso’s demands as exactly in line with industry norms for players of comparable level.  

Top Comment by Saltyone

I hope Pete doesn’t end up like Conforto, who used Boras and ended up out of baseball for a couple...more

Share your take

Debate

Boras made an effort to reassure Cohen that the terms were fair, but it was evident that the owner’s concerns had not been allayed. A persistent issue is Cohen’s dissatisfaction with the offer’s structure, namely the unfairness he perceives in the terms. These ongoing negotiations between Scott Boras and Steve Cohen are a perfect example of how complicated these things can get.

The story between Cohen and Boras is fundamentally about more than money; it’s an intriguing demonstration of power relationships, financial acumen, and player goals. The delicate dance between the front office of the Mets and one of the most powerful agents in the sport will ultimately determine not only Alonso’s future but also the team’s long-term course. Do you believe Pete Alonso should wait or simply accept whatever offer the Mets make?