Home/MLB

Despite being the top free-agent first baseman on the market this winter, Pete Alonso’s offseason might be a little more mysterious than expected. The need for a power-hitting 1B was thought to be widespread across the league. But then, a number of teams that seemed like ideal landing spots for Alonso went in completely different directions.

The Yankees? Yeah, they just went and grabbed Paul Goldschmidt. The Astros? Well, they made sure to sign Christian Walker. The Nationals? They traded for Nathaniel Lowe. Apparently, they were more into the ‘we can improve with a younger guy’ vibe. Sure, then what about the Tigers? Oh, they’re shifting Colt Keith over to first base like it’s no biggie and signed Gleyber Torres to ensure there’s even more infield juggling. Then what’s with Alonso? 

The Angels might have a chance with Pete Alonso 

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

On the latest episode of the Foul Territory podcast, host Scott Braun was joined by former MLB players Todd Frazier and Erik Klatz. Discussing the whole Pete Alonso situation, Braun said Do they (Angels) find a little void in the marketplace here and say ‘This guy is getting so many cons thrown his way that he’s actually undervalued at this point.'” Braun went on to add that Alonso is a fine player. Not above average, but a fine one. “He’s a bat that can bat 40, 50+ for you in a season” Scott added.  

Todd Frazier agreed with Braun and said, “He’s a guy that hits homers. Think about a healthy Mike Trout and a healthy Pete Alonso. I mean that’s a good one-two punch right there.” So, are the Angels looking for a traditional power-hitting first baseman to complement their lineup? Then, Pete Alonso is the better option. Nolan Schanuel, the current Angels 1B doesn’t offer the same raw power. Alonso can also be a great fit if the Angels want to upgrade their first base production or move Schanuel to a different position. While other teams could use Pete and have also shown interest, what about his former team?

The Mets are hesitant to offer the 30-year-old a long-term deal

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

What’s your perspective on:

Are the Mets making a mistake by hesitating on Alonso, or is it a smart move?

Have an interesting take?

The ongoing contract negotiations between Pete Alonso and the New York Mets are centered on the deal’s length, with financial terms reportedly less of an issue. MLB insiders like Jon Heyman and Ken Rosenthal have emphasized that the Mets are willing to settle on dollars per year but are hesitant to commit to a long-term contract. Alonso, at 30 years old, is entering the latter stages of his prime. And the Mets’ front office, led by David Stearns, is cautious about giving out lengthy contracts to players in their 30s—especially those reliant on power, like Alonso.

David Stearns‘ philosophy, reflects a broader trend in baseball where teams are wary of locking in long-term deals with aging players. Power hitters, particularly first basemen, often experience a decline in production as they enter their 30s. And evidently, the Mets want to avoid that potential downturn. So, if Alonso is really looking for a six-year deal, the New York Mets might not be the place. 

What happens if the Mets and Alonso cannot come to an agreement? Well, they always move forward with a short-term deal with a higher annual salary, giving Alonso financial security. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

What do you think awaits Pete Alonso? Share your thoughts in the comments.


Have something to say?

Let the world know your perspective.

Challenge Your Sports Knowledge!

Solve the puzzle and prove your knowledge of iconic players, terms, and moments.

Play Now!
0
  Debate

Debate

Are the Mets making a mistake by hesitating on Alonso, or is it a smart move?