As the New York Mets head into an offseason period, team owner Steve Cohen is confronted with a stark truth. When it comes to their key player, Pete Alonso, who rose through the ranks of the organization, he could potentially be the point of one of Cohen’s most challenging dilemmas yet. With Alonso set in the agency, the Mets must carefully consider whether to extend his contract or face the risk of losing him.

The Mets’ financial flexibility has been tested after the record-breaking $765 million signing of Juan Soto. While Alonso’s contributions are unquestionable—including a 2024 season where he posted 46 home runs and over 110 RBIs—his market value is climbing. Reports suggest Alonso could command a contract north of $250 million, forcing Cohen and President of Baseball Operations David Stearns to consider alternatives. Potential options like Christian Walker, who offers solid defense and power at a lower cost, have emerged, hinting at the organization’s willingness to pivot if talks stall.

Will the Mets resign Alonso?

In a YouTube video posted by WFAN, MLB insider Rico Brogna said, In the case of Pete Alonso, you get nothing. And I’ll tell you what I think that means. Number one, I don’t think we’re close to a conclusion. So for me and for others who are, I guess, obsessed with finding out, are they going to keep Pete Alonso? Are they going to lose Pete Alonso? I don’t think this is something we’re going to find out about anytime soon.” He further added, “I think if the Mets resign Pete Alonso, which at this point is a coin toss. The Mets could do it as late as February. I don’t think the Mets are going to be in this position where they’re going to tell Scott or Pete, ‘Hey, deadline’s January 10th, we got to move on’.”

Pete Alonso’s representation by Scott Boras, a known advocate for extracting maximum value in free agency, is complicating matters further. Boras’ involvement likely elongates the negotiation process as the Mets avoid setting an artificial deadline. Insiders suggest that a resolution may not come until February, leaving fans and analysts in suspense. If Alonso departs, the Mets risk not just losing their premier power hitter but also disrupting the clubhouse chemistry he helps anchor. Alonso’s leadership and fan appeal are vital, as evidenced by his consistency both on and off the field. Losing him could leave a void that even Cohen’s checkbook might struggle to fill.

On the flip side, the Mets have shown they’re willing to make bold moves. The acquisition of Soto indicates Cohen’s ambition to construct a perennial contender, even if that means difficult choices. Replacing Pete Alonso with a combination of emerging players like Mark Vientos or external signings could reshape the roster without exceeding spending limits.

Ultimately, Cohen’s next steps will define the Mets’ trajectory for years. While keeping Alonso would solidify their lineup, the decision to let him walk might provide financial flexibility for pitching and depth. For now, the Mets and their fans are bracing for an offseason filled with uncertainty.

Who can replace Pete Alonso at first base?

If Pete Alonso departs, the Mets could explore external and internal options for first base. Christian Walker, a free agent, stands out as a top alternative. Known for his reliable glove and power bat, Walker offers a strong all-around game and would come at a lower cost than Alonso. Other notable free agents like Rhys Hoskins or Brandon Belt could provide shorter-term solutions if the Mets prioritize flexibility over a long-term deal.

Internally, Mark Vientos could step into the role. While primarily a third baseman, his bat shows promise, and he could transition to first base with proper development. Another in-house option is Joey Meneses, a recent minor league signing who profiles as a potential bench contributor. While neither matches Pete Alonso’s star power, these options could allow the Mets to redistribute resources toward pitching or other areas of need.

While keeping Pete Alonso secures his bat and leadership, parting ways might allow the Mets to address other roster gaps. As the offseason unfolds, this high-stakes decision underscores the complexities of building a sustainable contender in the competitive NL East.