Home/MLB

The Mets’ 2025 offseason was like a blockbuster movie—big moves, big stars, and plenty of hype. Juan Soto headlined the show, and the bullpen got a solid supporting cast. But every great film has a weak spot, and for the Mets, it’s the rotation. The moment Frankie Montas went down, the script called for a bold move. Instead? Crickets. The Mets left the fans with a cliffhanger no one wanted.

David Stearns and the Mets’ front office seem convinced that their existing depth is enough to weather the storm. But let’s be real—this rotation already had question marks before Montas got hurt. Kodai Senga is the clear ace, but he dealt with injuries last year. Clay Holmes transitioned from a reliever to a starter with results so far in his new role. Griffin Canning has yet to realize his potential as expected, and while David Peterson has shown consistency, it hasn’t reached heights yet. Now, Montas’ injury takes away one of their presumed top arms, leaving a hole that needs filling.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

Mets’ winning mentality requires more than hope

Yet the Mets aren’t making any moves. No Jose Quintana reunion. No dipping into the trade market. No pursuit of veteran free agents is still lingering in free agency. The message from the front office? “We’re fine.” As informed by MLB.com’s Anthony DiComo on X. He said, “The Mets aren’t looking to add Jose Quintana (or anyone else) at this time, even after Frankie Montas’ injury. For now, they’re happy with their rotation depth.”

This isn’t just about one pitcher going down. It’s about a pattern. The Mets have built an exciting team with Juan Soto, Pete Alonso, and Francisco Lindor leading the offense, but a shaky rotation could undermine it all. The lack of action feels like a gamble, and not the smart, calculated kind; it’s the kind that screams overconfidence. Stearns’ approach to pitching focuses on internal development, and analytics worked with Sean Manaea and Luis Severino last year. But counting on that strategy again without any reinforcements? That’s a high-risk bet.

To make matters worse, there are viable options out there. Kyle Tucker and Jordan Montgomery remain unsigned for the next season, and can be traded now. While they’d be expensive, the Mets have the financial muscle to make it happen. Even lower-cost veterans could provide stability. But instead of making a move, the Mets are watching and waiting, hoping their internal fixes will be enough.

The frustration from fans is loud and justified. The Mets aren’t in a rebuild; they’re built to win now. But a strong lineup won’t mean much if the rotation falters. If another starter goes down, or if Holmes’ transition to the rotation doesn’t pan out, this inaction will look even worse.

What’s your perspective on:

Are the Mets gambling their season by ignoring their shaky rotation? What do you think?

Have an interesting take?

Social media erupts as the calls for action grow louder

The comment voiced frustration over the Mets’ reluctance to bolster their pitching staff, pointing out that a strong start should be a priority. By not adding reinforcements, they risk repeating last season’s struggles, a concern for fans who understand that pitching is inherently unpredictable. Depth remains crucial because injuries and underperformance can derail a rotation. Also, there’s no guarantee the Mets will get lucky again, and banking on the same approach could prove costly if their rotation depth fails to hold up.

This fan seems doubtful about Joc Pederson’s capacity to excel at high levels. Also showing disappointment in the Mets for depending too heavily on him. They anticipate that Pederson will face challenges in 2025 and feel that the team should have invested significantly in an alternative, whether by investing in free agency or making a substantial trade. Their main worry is that the Mets are placing trust in a player who might not meet expectations. This could potentially compromise their lineup or overall roster strength.

One highlights the contrast between the Mets’ massive spending on their offense—over a billion invested in players like Juan Soto and other key hitters—while seemingly neglecting their starting rotation. The speaker points out the imbalance, suggesting that despite their financial commitment to building an elite lineup, the team is taking a major risk by entering the season with a questionable pitching staff. It implies frustration with the front office’s priorities, as a great offense may not be enough if the starting rotation is weak and unable to consistently keep games competitive.

Another user showed concern that the Mets’ lack of pitching depth could derail their season. The user fears that the current rotation isn’t strong enough to support a deep playoff run, let alone a World Series appearance. Acknowledging the chance of making mistakes while pointing out that a robust initial team might not only hinder championship aspirations but also put the Mets in jeopardy of missing the playoffs altogether. This is a valid concern to have considering the Mets’ significant financial investment and lofty anticipations, particularly when compared to other leading teams with more formidable pitching lineups.

 

This fan talked about the Mets’ questionable decision-making regarding their starting rotation. Even before Frankie Montas’ injury, the rotation was already seen as a major risk, with concerns about durability and consistency. They argue that adding another starter, especially an affordable, reliable arm, should have been an obvious move to mitigate those risks. By failing to do so, the Mets have left themselves exposed to potential struggles, making their reluctance to bolster the rotation seem shortsighted.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

This statement reflects growing impatience with the Mets’ handling of their pitching concerns. The user sees the lack of action as a clear mistake, especially given the rotation’s existing uncertainties. Their anger suggests a belief that the team is making an easily avoidable error that could have serious consequences for the season. With resources available, failing to add even a low-cost starter appears to them as a needless risk, making it even harder for fans to accept.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

Right now, it feels like the Mets are overthinking it. Sometimes, the simplest solution is the best one: get more pitching. Otherwise, they might look back on this moment and realize they were “just being dumb.”

Have something to say?

Let the world know your perspective.

ADVERTISEMENT

0
  Debate

Debate

Are the Mets gambling their season by ignoring their shaky rotation? What do you think?

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT