Home/Olympics

via Reuters

via Reuters

Bryson DeChambeau can only celebrate his tremendous win against Rory McIlroy with a pang of defeat. He has gotten past all the backlashes and humiliations the golf community threw at him for joining LIV Golf. But how do you show him compassion now, when his skills are made into a joke before the rigid system?

DeChambeau will not amount to the “USA USA USA” chants as he did at Pinehurst last week. The qualification criteria at the Olympics has declined the 124th US Open winner, DeChambeau a chance to represent his nation, and here is why.

The persisting OWGR dilemma has impacted the Paris Olympics selection

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

A maximum number of four players can represent their country in an Olympic golf event. And this decision largely depends on the world rankings. Although Bryson DeChambeau has fared as high as the 4th position in the past OWGR rankings, he is no longer on the scene after his acquaintance with the Norman-led league, LIV Golf. OWGR does not recognize LIV Golf, and they have not found a way to measure and rank LIV golfers. Hence the dilemma.

However, the injustice of Olympic qualifying has been felt globally. LIV Golfer Branden Grace has pointed it out by notifying how he believes that Louis Oosthuizen and Dean Burmester can better represent the South African team in the Paris Olympic Games than Christiaan Bezuidenhout and Erik van Rooyen, who rank higher. Grace commented, “I think that’s maybe a good call of maybe each country picking or trying to get their own solution on how they get the criteria right for guys to qualify, things like that. It’s definitely a way forward. But the system at this stage, that’s not very accurate.” He further mentioned, “We all know that. We all talk about it week in and week out, but these should be the two guys probably representing South Africa out there.”

This year, the US team will be led by the two-time Masters champion Scottie Scheffler [OWGR: 1], the 2024 PGA Championship winner, Xander Schauffele [OWGR: 3], last year’s US Open winner, Wyndham Clark [OWGR: 5], and the two-time major winner, Collin Morikawa [OWGR: 7]. Hence, DeChambeau has not made it to the list of the best four US golfers in the world ranking and has not qualified.

USA Today via Reuters

DeChambeau has accepted the fact that LIV Golf has its demerits, yet he chooses to respect the situation. The present OWGR 10th, based on his 2024 major performances, is the 6th highest US golfer according to the ranking. He claimed to have given his best with his T6, T2, and T1 performance at 3 majors so far respectively, yet the outcome largely depends on the ‘current situation’. He further called it ‘frustrating’. DeChambeau, hence, confessed, “I’ve done my best up until now to give myself a chance according to the (world ranking), but I realize and respect where the current situation of the game is, albeit it’s frustrating and disappointing.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

But what is next? Is the qualifying system going to continue to bar DeChambeau in the future?

Bryson DeChambeau’s hope for the future

Although Bryson DeChambeau qualified four years ago at the Tokyo Games, he had to withdraw. A few weeks before his flight to Japan, DeChambeau tested positive for COVID-19. This year, even after his remarkable performance, LIV Golf’s political feuds and the restrictive qualifying system are not enabling the 2024 US Open winner to play in the Olympics. But Bryson DeChambeau is not disheartened. He said, “It hasn’t worked out that way, and again, I respect the decision that I made, and it is what it is. It hurts, but you know what? There’s another one four years later.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

In fact, even after missing out on the Paris Showdown, DeChambeau is rooting for being on the field in Los Angeles in 2028. He said while wishing for a resolution of LIV Golf’s position and the Olympic qualification requirements, “Hopefully 2028 will be a little different situation, and it will make it that much sweeter.”

Do you think the Olympics should change their criteria for ranking-based qualifications that are currently overlooking some of the best players? Let us know your own opinion about the present state of matters.