‘Absolutely Not’: Golf World Enters Into Major Debate After a Tweet Sparks Controversy

Golf fans all over the world have been following a recent Twitter dispute started by golf writer Sam Weinman. Golf Digest, a publication well known for its coverage of the sport, posted the tweet on its Instagram page and requested feedback from its followers. This article dives into the debate and considers reader responses to Golf Digest’s post.

Fans’ opinions on whether an interrupted round should count towards breaking 80 are divided. While some contend that playing an uninterrupted 18-hole round is essential, others point out the player’s already noteworthy accomplishment. The argument ultimately serves as a reminder of the complex nature of golf milestones and the distinctive difficulties that golfers encounter on the course.

Breaking 80 Amidst Interruption: Sam Weinman’s hypothetical scenario

In Sam Weinman’s hypothetical situation, the legality of breaking 80 when a round is cut short is called into an interesting question. In this instance, the player shoots 39 on the front nine, before having to halt because of inclement weather or an unexpected conflict. The player returns the next day and continues the round on the back nine, shooting a 40. The key question is whether this paused round qualifies as breaking 80, given that the player finally posts a combined score of 79.

Weinman’s tweet was shared on Golf Digest’s Instagram account, which is well-recognized for interacting with its fans on social media. 

The Instagram post, which was captioned “Would you count it?,” invited golfers to comment on whether this hampered round counts as breaking 80. As a result, there was a flurry of reactions from fans who excitedly expressed their opinions and participated in a passionate debate.

Fans respond to the question with varied perspectives

Golf fans paid close attention to the post, and a variety of viewpoints and ideas were expressed by the audience. Some supporters contended that breaking 80 demands playing an entire 18-hole round continuously, without any substantial breaks. Considering that the player did not finish the entire course in a single session, an interrupted round should not be regarded as officially breaking 80, according to this point of view.

One fan commented not agreeing with breaking 80, “Absolutely not!”

Yet, another Instagram fan opined his view in the same manner, the negative way, “No no no no no no!”

However, a different group of supporters contended that the golfer had previously proven his essential talent by shooting 39 on the front nine. They argued that because the player had previously shot a score under 80 after nine holes, the halted round should be considered to have broken 80.

Read More: After His $3,600,000 Payday, Champion Wyndham Clark Tops His 7-Years Career Earnings In Just 2 Months

One fan took to Instagram to express his opinion in a supportive tone, “Absolutely. You’re just completing the round you started.” 

Another fan stated an explanation on the debate, “Tournament round that is cut short due to darkness, yes it counts, other than that no it doesn’t.”

One Instagrammer expressed his own logical opinion by commenting on the post, “Well it counts on tour when play is suspended and players have to finish their rounds the next day.”

Another fan supported the breaking 80 by saying, “If it counts for pros for a stoppage in play it does for me.”

The discussion produced a passionate and animated exchange of ideas, illuminating the complexity and fervor of the golfing community. It brought home the arbitrary nature of identifying a significant golfing milestone like breaking 80 and sparked additional thought on the effects of pauses and the mental aspects of the game.

What are your thoughts on the controversy that was sparked by Sam Weinman? Let us know in the comments below.

Watch this story | Weeks after Greg  Norman’s LIV ladies series comment, LGPA Commissioner clears the air on rumors: ‘We’re really bullish‘