“More Dangerous Than Spa”: Following the Horrific Death of Dutch Prodigy, Max Verstappen Responds to Lance Stroll’s Demands to Point Out Higher Risk Circuit

The recent tragic death of Dutch racing prodigy Dilano Van ’t Hoff at the Spa-Francorchamps circuit has shaken the F1 world and sparked a debate on safety standards within F1. Aston Martin driver Lance Stroll called for changes to be made at the Eau Rouge-Raidillon section labeling it as “way too dangerous.” However, Max Verstappen has responded by highlighting the higher risks posed by other circuits, his remarks shed light on the ongoing safety concerns faced by drivers and the need for continued improvements in Formula 1.

Following a fatal crash during a Formula Regional European Championship at Spa-Francorchamps, some Formula 1 drivers have demanded modifications to the renowned Belgian Grand Prix circuit. Lance Stroll voiced his concerns about the safety of Eau Rouge-Raidillon, a famous section of corners, and called for necessary alterations. However, Verstappen pointed out that the accident involving Van ’t Hoff occurred beyond Eau Rouge, at the exit of Raidillon in the Kemmel straight. He argued that other, much newer tracks, such as Jeddah Corniche Circuit, pose even greater risks to drivers.

Tracks like Jeddah are more dangerous than Spa, says Verstappen after fatality
by u/HelloSlowly in formula1

Verstappen expressed his views on the matter, stating that while Eau Rouge is indeed a dangerous corner, sector one at Jeddah Corniche Circuit is potentially more perilous. He highlighted the blind nature of turns six, seven, and eight at Jeddah, explaining that a crash in that section could have severe consequences due to limited visibility. Verstappen emphasized the need to consider the relative dangers of different tracks and acknowledged the improvements made at Spa after Anthoine Hubert’s fatal accident in 2019.

Read more: Christian Horner Proves Too Rich to Handle for Billionaire Toto Wolff as Red Bull Serves Brutal Blow to Mercedes With a Masterstroke

Verstappen’s response challenges the notion that Spa-Francorchamps is the most hazardous circuit in Formula 1. By drawing attention to the risks presented by tracks like Jeddah, he raises questions about the overall safety standards within the sport. As the discussion continues, it becomes evident that there is a broader need to address circuit safety, assess the timing and conditions for race restarts, and provide drivers with adequate visibility to avoid potential accidents.

Verstappen’s Response to Dilano van’t Hoff’s Death

Dilano van’t Hoff, an 18-year-old driver participating in the Formula Regional European Championship, tragically lost his life during a race at Spa-Francorchamps. The fatal crash occurred on the Kemmel Straight under extremely wet conditions, with poor visibility due to thick spray. This incident bears similarities to the 2019 accident that claimed the life of Formula 2 driver Anthoine Hubert at the same circuit.

Verstappen expressed his dismay at the decision to restart the race in hazardous conditions, stating, “I saw some images from the race and it was very wet, so I think it was totally unnecessary to restart that race. You know that on a restart with so much water and spray, you don’t see anything.” He emphasized the potential risks associated with such restarts, as drivers further back in the field may take greater risks, resulting in accidents that could be avoided.

The incident serves as a somber reminder that the sport must prioritize the safety of its drivers. As discussions surrounding track safety continue, it becomes increasingly important to implement measures that prevent unnecessary accidents and protect the lives of talented young drivers like Dilano van’ t Hoff.

WATCH THIS STORY | Will Max Verstappen Retire Early from F1?