Singling out Lewis Hamilton to bring a problem to light? That seems to be the FIA’s modus operandi at the moment. Remember the poorly executed jewelry ban the FIA introduced last season? The governing body intended to bring forth the point that jewelry could increase the risk of burn injuries. Not fully committing to the implementation, the process dragged on for almost six months. Not once did the FIA make it clear that its push had nothing to do with Hamilton and everything to do with safety. Ultimately, the FIA became the bad guy, and its recent actions haven’t helped its case.
At the Qatar GP, Hamilton and his teammate George Russell collided on the first lap, instantly ending Hamilton’s race in the gravel. The Safety Car was deployed until the marshals cleared the seven-time champion’s car from there. But instead of waiting around for that to happen, Hamilton crossed the track to get to the pitlane on the other side.
It was a dangerous thing to do, considering there were cars on the track. Hamilton realized that and admitted his mistake in a hearing with the FIA, which ended with a $52,000 fine. The case was done and dusted, and everyone got past it. That was until the FIA decided to reopen it a week later.
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
Why? Because it wants to reassess the severity of Hamilton’s actions and determine whether the penalty should be stricter. Here’s the FIA’s statement: “The FIA notes that Lewis was apologetic during the subsequent stewards hearing into the incident and acknowledged that the crossing was a serious safety breach. However, in view of his role model status, the FIA is concerned about the impression his actions may have created on younger drivers.”
#F1: The FIA, one week one from the incident, has announced that it wants to look at Lewis Hamilton’s #QatarGP crossing incident again because it believes the incident was much more serious than perhaps originally thought.
Lewis Hamilton was was handed his first reprimand of the…
— deni (@fiagirly) October 15, 2023
Do you see anything amiss here? What does the FIA mean by “role model status?” More importantly, why is it singling out Hamilton (like it did with the jewelry ban) when this has happened with other drivers as well? Case in point: Max Verstappen after his crash with Hamilton at the 2021 Italian GP. Along with all this, the LH Army unleashed its fury on the governing body for its PR stunts.
Lewis Hamilton is on the receiving end of the FIA’s “biased rubbish”
The FIA has been under fire for quite some time now. The F1 community isn’t a fan of the organization or its working. The LH Army has especially been at odds with it since the 2021 Abu Dhabi GP debacle. Now, they feel the FIA is using Hamilton’s case to clear its name. By emphasizing that it’s “concerned about the impression his actions may have created on younger drivers,” the FIA hasn’t helped its case. Especially by targeting Hamilton.
A Twitter (now X) user wrote, “It’s #USGP week & the FIA is “revisiting” the #QatarGP penalty it served Hamilton “in view of his role model status.”
“Yes, Lewis is a role model, but that doesn’t mean he should be singled out for revised punishment. It’s not a good look for the governing body of a global sport.” Doesn’t the FIA’s motivation smell like PR to you?
Agree, weird announcement. Smells like PR
— andrew (@amait) October 16, 2023
What was the need to single out Hamilton? Yes, he’s one of the best the sport has ever seen, but shouldn’t every driver be a role model to every other driver?
Read More: “Can You Believe That?”: After $52,000 Penalty, Lewis Hamilton’s Ex-Nemesis Divulges Shocking Fact
It's just another example of how disorganised the @fia are and to focus solely on LH is ridiculous as everyone in @F1 should be classed as a role model
— Steven Lee (@slee198454) October 16, 2023
The LH Army still feels very badly about everything that transpired in Abu Dhabi that night. Reopening the case doesn’t look good for the FIA, both in terms of its consistency and supposedly unbiased nature.
"Its not a good look for the governing body" Sorry but that ship sailed away along with any integrity @Ben_Sulayem and the @fia had at the end if 21. The @fia and @Ben_Sulayem are a joke and are the one's showing globally how badly they are running the so called sport.
— Ray Armstrong© #TEAMLH #44 #COYS. (@thearmstrongs79) October 16, 2023
Didn’t the FIA introduce a standardized system for all this in 2022? Considering that, it’s made a “clown show” of itself.
Thank you! The @fia is a governing body that fails to keep up a high standard that is consistent and unbiased. Incredible at this level. What a clown show. https://t.co/GPb2rFTlNI
— Henry Mill (@_HenryMill) October 16, 2023
The thing is, Hamilton isn’t just a role model in F1. He stands for so much more outside the realm of F1 as well. Fans suspect that might be another reason for the FIA’s bias.
There is more to this than the reason they give. It also just so happens he's the only black person on the grid and the only one that is out spoken and defends human right issues and LGBTQ.
— Motorsport_Fan (@KJ16976372) October 16, 2023
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
And how can rules change based on how much of a “role model” someone is? Isn’t that unfair?
How can any sport base any rule decision by a measure of how much of a role model anyone is. How ridiculous! Only @FIA could come up with such biased rubbish
— Lord H 🏴 (@LordHasALamb) October 16, 2023
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
What are your thoughts on the Lewis Hamilton situation with the FIA?
Watch This Story: F1 Fans Bash the FIA as Lewis Hamilton Is Now Forbidden From Donning His Jewelry