‘George [Russell] Is Better’: Lewis Hamilton Given Pitiless Reality Check By F1 Champ at Las Vegas GP

 Under the bright neon lights of the Las Vegas GP, Mercedes’ dynamic duo, Lewis Hamilton and George Russell, geared up to leave their mark. They managed a grid position of 11th and 4th respectively. This plain-sightedly visible difference is something to be pondered upon. Especially if pointed out by the likeness of Jacques Villeneuve.

The qualifying session itself was a tale of contrasting fortunes for the Mercedes pair. Russell, showcasing prowess, clocked impressive times, consistently pushing the boundaries of what the Mercedes could achieve. His final practice performance, where he led the pack with a time of 1:34.093, proved his skill and the team’s hard work in setting up the car. The qualifying rounds saw Russell continue this form, eventually securing a commendable fifth place on the grid, a mere stone’s throw behind the leaders.

What did Jacques Villeneuve say about Lewis Hamilton’s qualifying?

Lewis Hamilton‘s qualifying journey, however, was rougher. After showing promise in earlier sessions, the British ace faced a setback in Q2, falling short of expectations. His struggles were not for lack of effort; Hamilton openly acknowledged the car’s lackluster performance and the team’s struggle with tire graining – a challenge that seemed to plague all competitors yet felt more acute in the Briton’s camp. Finishing 11th in the qualifying standings, Hamilton’s outcome was a somber reflection of the challenges that have dogged Mercedes throughout the season.

On this scenario, 1997 WDC Jacques Villeneuve, commented, “It seems to be a very peaky car with a very small window of operation and really hard to setup. George seems to be better at that. Lewis spent so many years with an easy car to drive with extra horsepower, when they didn’t have the right setup, the right strategy, they would still win.”

As the neon lights dimmed and the dust settled on the qualifying session, the tale of two drivers and their divergent paths on the Las Vegas strip offered a microcosm of Mercedes’ season. While Russell’s performance shone bright, a beacon of potential and progress, Hamilton’s run served as a sobering reminder of the hurdles still to be overcome. However, a contrasting analysis of Mercedes’ situation seems to make the picture clearer.

Read More: Contradicting Toto Wolff’s Harsh Scrutiny, Lewis Hamilton Relishes Las Vegas GP “Blast”

Mercedes’ performance analysis – Las Vegas GP Qualifying

Hamilton faced a rough ride in the qualifying rounds. After failing to leverage the Mercedes’ impressive pace, he was unexpectedly knocked out in Q2. His performance was a far cry from the expectations set by the previous day’s promising runs. Hamilton described his qualifying experience as “just not that great,” (as per Express UK) lamenting the changes made to the car overnight which led to a disappointing lack of grip and massive tire graining. His position in the qualifying round marked a significant downturn, standing in stark contrast to his teammate Russell’s results​​.

Meanwhile, George Russell shone brightly in the qualifying session. Russell secured the fourth position on the grid, just a whisker away from the top three with a time gap of +0.386 seconds from the pole position. His performance depicted his adaptability and skill, especially considering the chilly night-time conditions and the challenges posed by the Pirelli tires in the cooler environment. Russell also saw the weekend as a “weekend of opportunity,” (as per Sky Sports) a mindset that clearly paid off in the qualifying round. His optimism and readiness to capitalize on the unique conditions of the race demonstrated his growing prowess in the sport.

WATCH THIS STORY | Lewis Hamilton remains unwavering in his determination to halt Max Verstappen’s dominance, despite enduring significant neglect from the FIA

In conclusion, the Las Vegas GP qualifying session highlighted the divergent paths of the Mercedes drivers. The session was a microcosm of Mercedes’ season – a mix of high hopes, unfulfilled potential, and lessons learned, setting the stage for what they hope will be a more competitive 2024 season.