Since the past seasons, there has been one regular complaint from the fans. The All-Star game isn’t as competitive anymore. In the build-up to this weekend that was the only demand. With all of the best players assembled on the floor, they wanted some eye-catching action. Stars playing hard, making a dedicated effort to win the game and prove their conference is better. We were back to the classic conference battle, no more Elam winner either, it seemed like the needle would move. Before the event, Larry Bird, a legend who set the tone for such All-Star showdowns reiterated the fans’ thoughts.

“The one thing I would really like to see is they play hard tonight in this All-Star Game. I think it’s very important when you have the best players in the world together, you’ve gotta compete, and you’ve gotta play hard, and you’ve gotta show the fans how good they really are,” said the Celtics icon with solid conviction.

Records were broken that night. It was the first time a team had broken through the 200-point threshold. Yet, it was the same old disappointing story. The players played like it didn’t matter. It was a meaningless exhibition game that bored the fans. The vigor and excitement might have faded.

Luckily, the NBA might have already created a solution to the All-Star dilemma.

The All-Star isn’t like it used to be

The vintage All-Star games had a different zest to it. It was always full of life. It lived up to the basic standard – the best vs the best of both conferences. Every play had utmost dedication, fierce effort, and a yearning to prove their superiority. For fans, they recall the days of Michael Jordan vs Magic, Kobe Bryant trading shots with Marbury in 2001, and other memorable All-Star games.

That flair is no more.

Since the retirement of the Mamba, it was become more of a showcase. Albeit, years after leaving he did warn the NBA about the dropping standards of the All-Star exhibition. Bryant claimed a scrimmage in the gyms of UCLA felt more competitive than what the All-Star game was. This was way back in 2019.

He was ahead of his time and encapsulated the expectations of the fans perfectly. “Fans want to see the best pick-up game in the world. That’s what this is. They don’t want to see you running up and down and dunking, and doing all this crazy,” he said during his appearance on the Knuckleheads podcast in 2019.

The first year of the Elma winner rule, when the players honored Bryant and his daughter Giannis was the last display of any competition. Since then, there hasn’t been an ounce of desire to do so. The result is TV ratings dropping drastically. The 5.5 million viewers was an increase of 20% from last year. However, if we put that aside, it was the lowest mark since 2003, and the only time it has been below 6 million.

READ MORE-Where Are Stephen Curry, Trae Young and Other NBA Stars Spending Their Break?

The bitter truth? The All-Star game is losing its once glamorous stature. How can they fix it? Or better, does the NBA really need to fix it?

The In-Season Tournament should replace the All-Star game?

In its inaugural season, the In-Season tournament was a booming success. The NBA had an ambitious and unique vision to boost its TV ratings. It was to make those early season matchups, which generally account for a slump, to have life-changing consequences. Every Tuesday and Thursday they held group stage games for the IST. Not only did it make each game more important but it also offered something to the players.

Each stage had varied rewards. Each player of the winning team would receive $500,000. For a superstar like LeBron James and Steph Curry. that doesn’t matter. But for the lesser-known and accomplished players, this was a jackpot opportunity. Instantly, teams began to play purposefully. No one was willing to let such an incentive just slide off.

We saw inspiring performances, the birth of new superstars, and ultimately a Las Vegas showdown for the playoffs. The Indiana Pacers stood out. Tyrese Haliburton became an All-Star and made his talent sing. The Los Angeles Lakers proved how under pressure their composure doesn’t waiver. In the end, the 17-time champs led by King James and a dominant performance from Anthony Davis won the chip.

The finals attracted 4.58 million viewers, the most for any outside Christmas game since 2018. The overall viewership for that time span was up 41% from last year. The In-Season Tournament delivered on all its promises. It promoted competitive basketball, saw the best go the extra mile early in the season, and had fans’ eyes stuck to the game for the entire time.

The question is can it replace the All-Star game? I would say no. The All-Star game has been a tradition for decades. It’s the signature event of the event, or at least was. Moreover, the other events made strides this year, especially the revolutionary Stephen Curry vs Sabrina Ionescu challenge. It was the start of something fresh and transcendent. It’s such innovation that will help keep the weekend relevant. For the dunk contest, an incentive for the winner, the skills and dunk challenge can be abolished to make way for new events, or something more fascinating. What the NBA needs is the creativity to sparkle.

However, given the success of the IST, the NBA can be clever and advertise it on a much larger scale to transition it into its hallmark event. It buys them time to figure out how to make the All-Star weekend revive its zeal once again.

Watch the  Story: Why Did LeBron James, Jayson Tatum, and Other Superstars Opt Out of the Dunk Contest? Millionaire ESPN Analyst Reveals the Truth

But the history is too great to just end it altogether.