“They Are Biased”: Upset WBC President Claims Ring Magazine “Only Threatens the Credibility of the Sport”

Mauricio Sulaiman, president of the World Boxing Council (WBC), recently unleashed his candid opinion on the Ring Magazine Belt. Subsequently dismissing its significance in the boxing realm. In a passionate declaration, Sulaiman expressed his disdain. In addition, he questions why the media, champions, and promoters accord credibility to a belt that, in his eyes, poses a threat to the sport’s integrity.

The WBC chief, known for his no-nonsense approach, minced no words in denouncing the Ring Magazine’s rankings. Consequently, labeling them as corrupt.

Furthermore, Mauricio Sulaiman was adamant during his tenure as the president to clean up the sport. With these exhibition and crossover fights that seem to be having better payout, more and more pugilists are choosing that over non-titles. In an exclusive interview, clearly frustrated Sulaiman expresses his view on The Ring Magazine belt.

Mauricio Sulaiman speaks his mind

Sulaiman’s discontent extends to the perception of The Ring Magazine as a business rather than a genuine contributor to the sport. He emphasized that boxing’s essence lies in the efforts of those who unite the world of boxing. Additionally, it makes it safer and better. In contrast, he dismissed the notion of a paper magazine awarding a belt, emphasizing that such accolades hold no real meaning. “ It is he world Boxing United who makes boxing safer and better a paper magazine awarding a belt has no meaning.”

Furthermore, Mauricio, with a fiery tone declared, “If you touch my WBC, I am going to fight back.” His frustration stems from the recent declaration that the rankings of various boxing organizations are allegedly tainted. This revelation, coupled with the perceived bias of the Ring Magazine, has struck a nerve in the boxing world. ” They are a business. they make money, they are biased. That is not boxing.”

Rooted in his belief that the decisions made by the publication are arbitrary, the WBC president takes a strong stance against the Ring Magazine Belt. He acknowledged fighters’ appreciation for positive coverage. However, Sulaiman urges a closer examination of the magazine’s choices and hopes the boxing community understands the potential repercussions. Additionally, he calls for a halt to attaching value to magazine belts. In response to queries about Francis Ngannou‘s recent bout against Tyson Fury, he confirmed that Ngannou, a formidable enough boxer, deserved a rating by the WBC.

Mauricio’s role in Francis Ngannou’s ranking

It was a seemingly mismatched bout between undefeated WBC champion Tyson Fury and MMA fighter Francis Ngannou. The French-Cameroonian surprised everyone by landing a powerful left hook that floored Fury in the third round. Despite Fury recovering and securing a split-decision win, Ngannou’s performance left an impression.

Read More: ‘Five Years Old’ Francis Ngannou Possessed Power of a 10 Year Old, Ex UFC Champ’s Mother Makes Bold Claim Before Million Dollar Tyson Fury Clash

Ngannou, known for his MMA background, defended his ranking, with WBC President Sulaiman citing his achievements in different combat sports. Mauricio Sulaiman praised Ngannou’s performance against Fury, indicating a recommendation for his high ranking. If approved, Ngannou would surpass fighters like Filip Hrgovic and Daniel Dubois. However, he plans to return to MMA next year.

Sulaiman’s fervent rejection of the Ring Magazine Belt adds a new layer of intrigue to the boxing narrative. The question now lingers: Will the media and stakeholders heed Sulaiman’s call to reassess the significance of magazine belts? Or will the traditional allure of such accolades continue to hold sway in the world of boxing?

Watch This Story: Francis Ngannou’s Biggest Fight Purses In The UFC