“This Is Pretty Low”: Mayweather Promotions CEO Joins Boxing World in Slamming Matchmaker Rick Glaser for ‘No R.I.P’ Take On Demise of Longtime Boxing Manager

In the wake of Cameron Dunkin’s death, a respected boxing manager, Leonard Ellerbe and the boxing world faced an unexpected shock. Rick Glaser, a known matchmaker, instead of offering condolences, tweeted a blunt “Good Riddance” to Dunkin. Why would someone express such harshness at a time of mourning?

The boxing community, typically presenting a united front in grief, found itself divided by Glaser’s words. His stark departure from the norm of respectful remembrance sparks controversy. What could lead to such a blatant dismissal of decorum?

Cameron Dunkin’s passing and Rick Glaser’s controversial response

Cameron Dunkin, a towering figure in the boxing management world, passed away at 67 after a long-standing battle with cancer. His demise marked the end of an illustrious career, during which he guided the fortunes of many celebrated boxers. Most notably, at the time of his death, he was managing the promising talent of Jaron ‘Boots’ Ennis, the IBF welterweight titleholder.

In stark contrast to the usual tributes, Rick Glaser, a boxing matchmaker, took to social media with a jarring statement. He tweeted, “Breaking, longtime Boxing Manager #CameronDunkin has passed away this morning… There’s no R.I.P. here, it’s Good Riddance Cameron Dunkin. The lies have now officially stopped.” This provocative tweet sharply veered away from the expected norms of respect and condolence, igniting a wave of criticism across the boxing community.

Hi comments set set the stage for a storm of reactions from notable figures like Leonard Ellerbe and others within the boxing fraternity.

Leonard Ellerbe and others disapprove of Rick’s tweet

The reaction to Rick Glaser’s incendiary tweet was swift and severe, resonating throughout the boxing world. Leonard Ellerbe, the CEO of Mayweather Promotions, led the charge, expressing his deep disdain for Glaser’s remarks. Ellerbe, known for his straightforwardness, vehemently criticized Glaser, labeling him as exceptionally contemptible within the boxing community.

Following Ellerbe’s lead, others in the boxing circle voiced their disapproval. One person pointed out the lack of empathy in Glaser’s words, reminding everyone that even those we disagree with have families who feel their loss deeply.

Jamel Herring, a respected boxer, offered a different angle, suggesting that Glaser’s motive might be to generate controversy for personal gain. He highlighted the disturbing trend of exploiting sensitive situations for clicks and views.

Another user chimed in, expressing disappointment in Glaser’s choice of words.

Lastly, one person commented on the heartlessness of Glaser’s statement, particularly considering the impact on Dunkin’s family.

Each of these reactions, varying in perspective, collectively highlighted a fundamental expectation within the boxing community: a standard of respect and empathy, especially in the wake of a loss. This incident serves as a poignant reminder of the impact our words can have, particularly in moments of collective mourning.

Also Read: “Cool Guy RIP”: Errol Spence Jr Mourns Saddening Demise of Young Boxing Prospect

It raises a crucial question for all of us, not just in the world of boxing but in every sphere of interaction: How do we balance the freedom of expression with the responsibility of empathy, especially in the face of someone’s passing?

Watch this story: These 5 Boxers Lost Over 4 Million in Fines