“One of the Worst Decisions in Boxing”: Chael Sonnen Ropes in Controversial Evander Holyfield vs Lennox Lewis Fight While Questioning KSI vs Tommy Fury Fight Result

In the vast boxing universe, controversies are no strangers. Yet, when someone like Chael Sonnen chimes in, eyebrows raise. Sonnen, a seasoned combat sports veteran, recently dropped a bombshell. Drawing a parallel between two wildly different bouts, he’s sparked an intense debate. The KSI vs. Tommy Fury match verdict?

Questionable at best, according to Sonnen. But the surprise doesn’t end there. He dared to rope in another bout, one from the annals of boxing history. Remember Holyfield vs. Lewis from 1999? Sonnen certainly does. What peculiar connection did he find between these two disparate fights? Why invoke a controversy from decades ago?

Sonnen speaks out: Was KSI truly robbed in the ring?

The KSI vs. Tommy Fury fight unfurled amidst roaring expectations. As the rounds progressed, spectators witnessed a tug of war and clinch-fest more than boxing. However, when the dust settled, the declared winner was Tommy Fury, albeit with a controversial majority decision. Sonnen, analyzing the aftermath, pointedly said, “One judge has it a draw and the other two judges have it the same way. So the majority decision goes to Fury. And it was a surprise!”

Yet, Sonnen wasn’t alone in expressing astonishment. John Fury, commenting on the fight’s outcome, candidly mentioned, “I would have had no problems had they given it to KSI.” Such honesty is rarely seen in the boxing realm, making his reaction all the more noteworthy.

Moreover, Sonnen’s reference to the Holyfield vs. Lewis bout from 1999 was particularly thought-provoking. “One of the worst decisions in boxing was Evander Holyfield vs Lennox Lewis. Lennox Lewis took him apart… and they scored it a draw,” he remarked.

Elsewhere in the boxing community, the reactions kept pouring in. Jake Paul, no stranger to boxing controversies himself, tweeted, “That wasn’t boxing. Only wins on point deduction.” Esports personality Jake Sucky echoed similar sentiments, implying that Tommy was handed the victory to maintain his family’s honor. Through it all, the message was clear: while the fight may be over, the discussions, debates, and dissections have only just begun.

Carl Froch’s scathing review

Carl Froch, renowned for his no-nonsense analysis, didn’t mince words about the KSI-Tommy Fury bout. From the get-go, Froch expressed indifference to KSI’s flashy green Lamborghini entrance, indicating that the real disappointment was the fight itself. Describing it as “absolutely f***ing diabolical,” Froch didn’t hesitate to label it the “worst fight” he’s ever witnessed. He derided KSI’s in-ring antics, comparing his boxing to doing “star jumps” on the canvas.

As for Fury, Froch lamented the lack of finesse, noting an absence of skillful footwork and head movement. He emphasized the fight’s lack of competitiveness, painting a picture of two fighters hesitant to engage. Froch’s critique didn’t end there. He voiced his dissatisfaction with the bout’s short duration, expressing his expectation for at least eight or ten rounds instead of a mere six. The message was clear: for Froch, this fight severely missed the mark.

Also Read: Why Now Is the Best Time for KSI To Fight Jake Paul

While figures like Chael Sonnen draw parallels with historic bouts, others, like Carl Froch, aren’t afraid to call it as they see it. This collision of opinions brings us to an essential reflection: How do you, the reader, perceive these crossover fights? Are they a fresh wave in the boxing world, or merely a transient spectacle?

Watch This Story: What’s Next for Tommy Fury after Controversial Win Over KSI?