Floyd Mayweather, the boxing maestro, has done it again. But not with his fists. This time, with words. In a realm where punches make headlines, words, it seems, can still leave a mark. The boxing arena is buzzing, and not because of a historic match. Devin Haney’s offer to Shakur Stevenson is the epicenter. A 75/25 split. Sounds like the share of a prize purse, doesn’t it?
It’s more than that. It’s the root of a fresh controversy. Mayweather has chimed in, and it’s not in the chorus you’d expect. Hypocrisy, fairness, deals, and a tale of two boxers. It all blends into a whirlwind of opinions and takes.
Beyond the punches: Floyd Mayweather steers the Haney-Stevenson debate
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
Jumping right into the heart of the matter, Floyd Mayweather recently commented on Devin Haney’s offer to Shakur Stevenson, emphasizing that Stevenson should be treated just as fairly as Haney. Further, Mayweather pointed out the apparent injustice in Devin being sent to Australia twice, urging him to reassess his ties with his promoter.
With this, fans were quick to weigh in. Firstly, Hamed was off the mark. He highlighted Shakur Stevenson’s lack of any belts and underscored Haney’s undisputed status. Moreover, he was critical of Mayweather, hinting that the boxing legend might have taken a similar stance as Haney in such circumstances.
Shakur Stevenson has no belts and has never headlined a PPV. Haney is Undisputed and A-Side
Floyd Mayweather is a hypocrite he would do the same thing in Devin Hanney’s position
— Hamed (@HamedBoxing) August 8, 2023
BoxingMD chimed in with a differing perspective. He regarded Haney as someone who barely managed a win against a notably smaller opponent, suggesting an inflated sense of self-worth.
Haney is a clown.. eeeked out a questionable win vs a smaller lomo and thinks he God
— boxingMD (@BoxingMD1) August 8, 2023
Jim Yang, on the other hand, found resonance with Mayweather’s sentiments, appreciating the truth in the boxing legend’s words.
Floyd drops truth.
— Jim Yang (@bionicleap77) August 8, 2023
Erick Johnson II came in with a balanced perspective. He believed Shakur should’ve accepted Haney’s offer, much like Haney did for his undisputed status. In Johnson’s eyes, Haney’s actions validated his hunger for the title, something he felt Stevenson lacked.
Nah Shakur should've accepted the hard split like Devin did for undisputed. Devin proved he wanted undisputed and Shakur didn't in my opinion. Salute to Dev. 💯💯
— Erick Johnson II (@terryjo23607581) August 8, 2023
Kevin Pareja wrapped things up with an observation on the belt count. He pointed out the stark difference between Devin’s five belts and Shakur’s none, suggesting that Stevenson might need a significant win, like against Loma, to demand a bigger slice of the purse.
Come on man. Devin has 5 belts Shakur has zero belts. If Shakur beats Loma for the mandatory position then he can get a higher percentage in the purse bid
— Kevin Pareja (@KevinPareja9) August 8, 2023
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
Through it all, the discourse remained focused, passionate, and charged, proving once again that in the boxing world, debates outside the ring can be as engaging as those within.
Also Read: Jake Paul Mocks Floyd Mayweather and Canelo Alvarez After Defeating Nate Diaz in a 10-Round Fight
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
However, amid the maelstrom of opinions, where do you stand? So, do you find yourself nodding in agreement with Mayweather or aligning with those who believe Haney’s offer is justified? Do let us know in the comments section below.
Watch This Story: Top 5 Best Selling PPV of Floyd Mayweather’s Boxing Career