After the 2024 US Open, Iga Swiatek took a break from the Tour. During that phase, she also withdrew her name from some of the tournaments, citing personal reasons. There were several speculations surrounding her absence. However, eventually, when the news about her doping controversy broke, the tennis world was shocked! Ever since that day, Swiatek and the whole process surrounding this incident faced a lot of question marks. And now another tennis bigwig has highlighted the “lack of transparency” in this case.
The 57-year-old former English player and current sports broadcaster, Jason Goodall recently appeared on the Tennis Channel Live show. During the show, he was spotted hitting Iga Swiatek’s doping case for lack of transparency. The Englishman said, “We’ve had a couple of high-profile doping cases this season with Jannik Sinner and Iga Swiatek. And the one thing I didn’t like was the lack of transparency in those two cases.”
He further added, “So, we only learned of Sinner’s before the start of the US Open and that happened very early on in the season in the spring, and with Iga’s, the back of the US Open we were told she is just having a little bit of time with her coach working on different aspects of the game. That wasn’t the case. That was just a blatant lie. So we didn’t know she was serving a soft suspension. Why wouldn’t we know that? Just tell the truth.” Goodall said that if the player is tested positive like Jannik Sinner then people must know the facts of the case.
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
Jason Goodall asked for spokespeople who would be there to give answers to all the queries in these two cases. However, he was surprised to see “this doesn’t happen in tennis.” After that, he further took a jibe at the system and added, “Everybody hides behind everything and no one can get any answer.” However, is Goodall the only one to raise on question mark on these things? We’ve seen several tennis stars raising their voice against how Jannik Sinner and Iga Swiatek initially escaped a long suspension easily.
“That was just a blatant lie”
Jason Goodall articulately calling out the blatant lack of transparency in the 2 doping cases. I wonder if he’ll get the same abuse many here have gotten for simply calling a lie, a lie. pic.twitter.com/AoN6jjSKIU— efghijk (@egrrrrrl8446) December 20, 2024
Simona Halep, who was provisionally suspended in October 2022 for anti-doping violations and later banned for 4 years, a period which was then reduced to 9 months in March this year highlighted the “big difference” in how her doping cases were treated. Iga Swiatek was handed a one-month ban while Halep was out of action for over 18 months following two separate anti-doping violations, Later on in an interview with the Telegraph Sport, Simona Halep even took an indirect jibe at Iga Swiatek.
She said, “The woman player – I don’t want to give name, you know about who I’m talking about – she had the three-week suspension, then she played two events, and then she gets again suspension. What is this? I mean, I don’t understand. So I feel it is not fair.” So, lack of transparency was always an issue that has been popping up several times in the last few weeks. Why was the process kept confidential, though? Well, as per several reports, WADA doesn’t mandate the announcement of provisional suspensions. Some sports do it and some don’t. Tennis actually does, with the ITIA erring on the side of transparency.
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
As per various reports, the exception to that rule comes when a player appeals against the suspension within 10 days, as was the case with Iga Swiatek. Once appealed, the case is considered to be under investigation and therefore confidential from the ITIA side until it has been concluded. Apart from Halep, there is another one who has caused a massive uproar in the tennis world with his controversial comments on these doping cases. His name is Nick Kyrgios and recently we saw Jason Goodall taking a jibe at the Aussie for ‘stirring the pot’ continuously.
Tennis Insider hits back at Nick Kyrgios amid Iga Swiatek and Jannik Sinner’s doping saga
Nick Kyrgios was among the first ones who had initially called out for a 2-year ban on Jannik Sinner for failing the doping tests. Then after that, when Iga Swiatek was also found testing positive for the doping test, Nick Kyrgios was spotted taking indirect jibes at both these players. For example, during an instance, while expressing his excitement for his comeback, Kyrgios said, “Back out there…blessed..without failing any drug tests.” After that in another instance, the Aussie wrote, “I have an 8-figure career. Grand slam finalist and beaten all of the greatest of all time. Doesn’t seem bad to me. No drugs either.“
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
After hearing these continuous digs about Iga Swiatek and Jannik Sinner, Jason Goodall shared his thoughts on Nick Kyrgios’ controversial comments. During the Tennis Channel Live podcast, Goodall said, “Not guilty? If that’s the case then you move on, and if you don’t like the process, that’s fair enough. Then you got to perhaps question the process but the process had had its day and decided that he’s (Sinner) is not guilty.”
He further added, “So with Iga we know we all have taken melatonin in the past. You buy from the chemist and you trust that process, right? You can’t test those tablets on yourself! So, when you’re found guilty and you can find the source really quickly which both these athletes were able to do, then you move on.” After that, while addressing Kyrgios he said, “With Nick, I think he likes the controversies, doesn’t he? I think he likes to keep his name up there and relevant.” Do you agree with what Jason Goodall had to say about Nick Kyrgios, though?
Have something to say?
Let the world know your perspective.
Debate
Why does transparency seem to vanish when it comes to high-profile doping cases in tennis?
What’s your perspective on:
Why does transparency seem to vanish when it comes to high-profile doping cases in tennis?
Have an interesting take?