Home/Olympics

via Getty

via Getty

0
  Debate

Debate

Is the Paris Olympics rule ruining tennis, or are players just making excuses to withdraw?

The Paris Olympics have begun, but not without a pinch of disappointment. While many tennis players have been given the chance to shine at this prestigious event, some deserving athletes were left out. Recently, Andy Roddick openly criticized the Olympics’ alternate system for singles, echoing concerns raised by Novak Djokovic following his first-round match.

He brought up the fact that doubles players are being given the chance to compete in singles events even if they haven’t played in singles. When Cam Norrie and Alex de Minaur departed from the competition and other players had to step in, this problem came to light. Just not them; there are other players who judged between the categories, raising a lot of concern around the tennis world.

Roddick took to his Twitter account to share his criticism, emphasizing the need for a more equitable selection process that ensures singles players who have earned their spot are not overlooked in favor of those primarily focused on doubles.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

He wrote, “The Olympics singles alternate situation is ridiculous. Players that don’t even/cant play singles at highest level getting the call is dumb.” Subsequently, not only Andy Roddick but also Carlos Alcaraz, a four-time major champion, found the situation perplexing and shared his perspective.

The third-ranked tennis player voiced his worries after winning in the first round, saying, “It’s a difficult rule, I guess. Honestly, there are a lot of players who deserve to be here and playing in the Olympic Games. I think it should be different because the next singles player in the rankings deserves to be here if someone withdraws from the tournament.”

Following the statement, it won’t be wrong to say that Alcaraz’s remarks echo the growing sentiment among top players that the current alternate system needs reevaluation to ensure fairness and meritocracy in Olympic tennis. On the other side, after defeating a rival who hadn’t played singles in two years, Novak Djokovic has taken a strong stance on the same issue and has called for an amendment to the Olympic rules.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

What’s your perspective on:

Is the Paris Olympics rule ruining tennis, or are players just making excuses to withdraw?

Have an interesting take?

Novak Djokovic wants an Olympic rule change

Djokovic was noticeably less amused after winning in under an hour and voicing his dissatisfaction with the existing system. He claimed that he didn’t think Matthew Ebden, an Australian doubles player of 36 years who hadn’t played a big draw, or tour-level singles match since June 2022, should have been on the Olympic courts.

He added, “I really don’t understand the rules. They’re really not logical for me. I don’t think it’s a good image for the sport, to be honest. There were a lot of singles players that had plenty of time, that were alternates, that could have been called to come. This part I don’t get.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

Ebden was in Paris for the men’s doubles, where he performed quite well, despite not having a singles ranking since May 2023. When Holger Rune had to withdraw from the singles tournament because of an injury, he took over. Many tennis fans were incensed by his acceptance of the challenge, given that he had not practiced singles for two years.

Nevertheless, what are your thoughts on Roddick’s concern? Do let us know in the comment section below.