Home/Tennis

USA Today via Reuters

USA Today via Reuters

0
  Debate

Debate

Is the doping case against Jannik Sinner a witch hunt or a legitimate concern?

Jannik Sinner is certainly navigating one of the stormiest periods of his career. While his remarkable talent has kept him battling it out in tournaments, the looming cloud of a doping controversy has now cast a shadow over his progress. Despite being cleared by the ITIA, the saga took a new twist with WADA’s recent appeal, reigniting uncertainty around Sinner’s future. As Sinner fights on the court, this off-court battle might be far from over, keeping him tangled in a saga that could stretch well into next year. So, when can the Italian ace breathe easy again?

In an unexpected turn of events, the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) has filed an appeal to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) to reopen the case against Sinner. It took a firm stance on Sinner’s entire doping controversy and stated that the Independent Tribunal’s decision of “no fault or negligence” was improper under the applicable standards. While it is now up to CAS to decide whether to open the case and determine its timeline, it is highly unlikely that Sinner will be free from the controversy this year.

Based in Lausanne, Switzerland, CAS usually takes at least three months to begin the hearing procedures, per Gazzetta. Even if the process is expedited, the presentation of evidence, witnesses, and debates on various aspects of the case will likely stretch it out, possibly extending Sinner’s struggles into the next year. However, Sinner will be allowed to compete in all tournaments that he wishes to until a final verdict is announced in the case.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

 

Remember, Sinner tested positive twice for low levels of a metabolite of clostebol during Indian Wells. Clostebol is a banned anabolic steroid that can be used in ophthalmological and dermatological treatments. The ruling of the Independent Tribunal initially went in Sinner’s favor, though there were still demands for harsher punishments. Now, WADA has appealed to CAS and is demanding a lengthy ban of one to two years for the player, without the cancellation of results and prize money, except for those from Indian Wells, which have already been revoked.

Interestingly, this is the first time that WADA has appealed the decision of an independent international tribunal in a sport like tennis. WADA is usually known for limiting such actions to anti-doping organizations or federations. For context, the ITIA had found that Sinner’s physio, Giacomo Naldi, had used an over-the-counter spray containing clostebol to treat a cut on his own finger. Naldi then massaged Sinner without gloves, which eventually resulted in the substance being transferred to Sinner’s body. This is likely why even Sinner was surprised by the appeal.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

What’s your perspective on:

Is the doping case against Jannik Sinner a witch hunt or a legitimate concern?

Have an interesting take?

Responding to the appeal, Sinner said that he was “very disappointed and also surprised,” by WADA’s move. But amidst the testing times, the Italian dynamo has continued to receive support from some of the veterans of the sport, who have rallied behind him. 

Jannik Sinner receives support from Mark Petchey amidst doping controversy

Jannik Sinner was known for his clean record until the doping case came to light. While the player was ultimately let off with a fine, several figures in the tennis community, including Nick Kyrgios, expressed their frustration over the matter and called for stricter punishment. In such testing times, Sinner is seeking support, and former pro Mark Petchey has provided just that.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

Responding to WADA’s latest appeal, Petchey rallied behind Sinner. Taking to X, the former British player wrote, “Just for the record there is ZERO scandal in the Sinner case. He and his lawyers worked within the framework of what the rules are in the situation he found himself and got a decision based on the evidence presented. No conspiracy, no cover up.” He also seemed to question the entire process and the appeal. “WADA today have looked at it and decided that they want to appeal the decision based on the “no fault or negligence” was not correct under the applicable rules. This is how the law works every single day.”

For now, it will be interesting to see if Sinner can emerge from this turbulent phase soon and continue to dominate the courts as World No. 1.