Carlos Alcaraz recently secured his third Grand Slam title by defeating Alexander Zverev in a five-set thriller at the finals of the 2024 French Open. But more than the result of the match, a controversial call from the chair umpire, Renaud Lichtenstein, during the fifth set has taken the limelight. Fans are now wondering whether that 2mm error robbed the German tennis star of his first Grand Slam win. Andy Roddick is one of those tennis fans who thinks players are “normally right” with these line calls. But another group of fans completely disagree with his statement!

The 41-year-old American tennis legend took to X to express his views on this controversial incident. Per the former World No. 1, an umpire explaining to a player how a ball travels and how to read a mark is always a bit “laughable” to him. He feels most tour umpires have barely played tennis in their careers.

“Players normally right. Shotspot showed Zverev saw mark correct way … Cant replace real-life playing reps when reading marks correctly. Good riddance to these umpires trying. Bring in the machines full-time,” Andy Roddick added.

Alexander Zverev was left absolutely perplexed at that moment. Had the umpire called Carlos Alcaraz’s second served as out, the German would have leveled the set 2-2. But instead, it was Alcaraz who went on to hold the serve before cruising to his emphatic victory over Zverev.

After the match, the German said, “I mean, look, there’s a difference whether you’re down 3-1 in the fifth set or you’re back to two-all. That’s a deciding difference. It’s frustrating. You wish there wouldn’t be mistakes.“

A group of tennis fans was left fuming. They called out the tournament for not having Hawk-Eye at such a prestigious event. While another group of fans took a jibe at Andy Roddick for sympathizing with Alexander Zverev.

“The technology is also not perfect” – Fans completely disagree with Andy Roddick’s take on Alexander Zverev

The tennis world is currently divided on whether or not to have an Electronic Line Calling (ELC) system in the matches. Several bigwigs of the game, like Coco Gauff’s coach Brad Gilbert have always been a strong supporter of this electronic system. But there are other sets of personnel who think even technology is not always perfect.

“Players are wrong *a lot* especially in high-pressure moments. They are also biased lol, they are not just objectively looking at every mark. The technology is also not perfect, it has a margin of error and it can get it wrong,” a fan tweeted.

Alexander Zverev was quite adamant that Carlos Alcaraz’s second serve had gone out. He was even seen arguing with the umpire. But the umpire looked unmoved even when the television replays later showed that the Spaniard’s serve had been actually out by 2mm. Seeing Zverev’s reaction, one of the fans wrote, “Zverev of all people should know that those who are in position to judge and apply the law; as an instrument of justice; can not be questioned about the outcome of the procedure.“

Andy Roddick thinks players are “normally right” but the fans feel that’s not the case always. Another fan showcased his disagreement with Roddick’s statement by writing, “Oh that’s not-” in the comment box.

Umpires can’t be the players’ friends! They are often found in disagreement with players on multiple occasions. But who’s right and who’s wrong? Both players and umpires have a deep understanding of the game and it takes years of training to reach their respective positions. To err is human!

One of the fans thinks Roddick rushed a bit while commenting that players are “normally right“. The fan said, “What?? they spend their lives watching & adjudicating tennis. what makes you think standing on court hitting the ball with your racket gives you a better knowledge and understanding of how the ball travels?“

A tennis match, without an umpire is not an official match! The role of umpire demands a profound understanding of the game, impeccable decision-making skills, and the ability to handle intense pressure-like situations. A fan questioned Roddick’s take on the umpires stating, “Woah Andy, is this your hot take? Because I feel this is one of those moments where a player says ‘well you don’t play, so how can you even understand’. These people learn in a different way. I know umpires will make mistakes, but they learn their craft in a different way.“

Mistakes do happen in a game and they can completely change the outcome of the match. But later on, even Alexander Zverev admitted that umpires make mistakes and they’re also human and that’s okay. What are your thoughts on this controversial incident?